mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

One Size Does Not Fit All: The Case for Personalised Word Complexity Models

arXiv 2205.02564 ↗First posted 5 May 2022cs.CL cs.AI cs.HCcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Complex Word Identification (CWI) aims to detect words within a text that a reader may find difficult to understand. It has been shown that CWI systems can improve text simplification, readability prediction and vocabulary acquisition modelling. However, the difficulty of a word is a highly idiosyncratic notion that depends on a reader's first language, proficiency and reading experience. In this paper, we show that personal models are best when predicting word complexity for individual readers. We use a novel active learning framework that allows models to be tailored to individuals and release a dataset of complexity annotations and models as a benchmark for further research.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2022.

Builds on

8 of 67 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Learning Active Learning from Datacited by 100
  2. 2018A Report on the Complex Word Identification Shared Task 2018cited by 30
  3. 2018A Word-Complexity Lexicon and A Neural Readability Ranking Model for Lexical Simplificationcited by 24
  4. 2020CompLex: A New Corpus for Lexical Complexity Prediction from Likert Scale Datacited by 24
  5. 2022On the Ethical Considerations of Text Simplificationcited by 20
  6. 2021SemEval-2021 Task 1: Lexical Complexity Predictioncited by 19
  7. 2019On the complexity of logistic regression modelscited by 3
  8. 2020Adaptive Forgetting Curves for Spaced Repetition Language Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

10 papers.