One Size Does Not Fit All: The Case for Personalised Word Complexity Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Complex Word Identification (CWI) aims to detect words within a text that a reader may find difficult to understand. It has been shown that CWI systems can improve text simplification, readability prediction and vocabulary acquisition modelling. However, the difficulty of a word is a highly idiosyncratic notion that depends on a reader's first language, proficiency and reading experience. In this paper, we show that personal models are best when predicting word complexity for individual readers. We use a novel active learning framework that allows models to be tailored to individuals and release a dataset of complexity annotations and models as a benchmark for further research.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2022.
Builds on
8 of 67 references.
References · 8
- 2017Learning Active Learning from Datacited by 100
- 2018A Report on the Complex Word Identification Shared Task 2018cited by 30
- 2018A Word-Complexity Lexicon and A Neural Readability Ranking Model for Lexical Simplificationcited by 24
- 2020CompLex: A New Corpus for Lexical Complexity Prediction from Likert Scale Datacited by 24
- 2022On the Ethical Considerations of Text Simplificationcited by 20
- 2021SemEval-2021 Task 1: Lexical Complexity Predictioncited by 19
- 2019On the complexity of logistic regression modelscited by 3
- 2020Adaptive Forgetting Curves for Spaced Repetition Language Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2023Dancing Between Success and Failure: Edit-level Simplification Evaluation using SALSAcited by 15
- 2023Personalized Jargon Identification for Enhanced Interdisciplinary Communicationcited by 11
- 2023Japanese Lexical Complexity for Non-Native Readers: A New Datasetcited by 5
- 2026Personal Salience: Highlighting Is Social, but Individuality Lives in Selectioncited by 5
- 2023Deep Learning Approaches to Lexical Simplification: A Surveycited by 4
- 2024Difficult for Whom? A Study of Japanese Lexical Complexitycited by 4
- 2026RALS: Resources and Baselines for Romanian Automatic Lexical Simplificationcited by 1
- 2024Using Letter Positional Probabilities to Assess Word Complexitycited by 0
- 2025Explain Less, Understand More: Data-Efficient Personalization of Reader-Dependent Jargonscited by 0
- 2025Breaking the Curse of Knowledge: Designing Personalized Jargon Support for Real-Time Online Meetingscited by 0
- 2026RALS: Resources and Baselines for Romanian Automatic Lexical Simplification22 Jul 2026
- 2026Personal Salience: Highlighting Is Social, but Individuality Lives in Selection8 Jun 2026
- 2025Breaking the Curse of Knowledge: Designing Personalized Jargon Support for Real-Time Online Meetings13 Aug 2025
- 2025Explain Less, Understand More: Data-Efficient Personalization of Reader-Dependent Jargons22 May 2025
- 2024Difficult for Whom? A Study of Japanese Lexical Complexity24 Oct 2024
- 2024Using Letter Positional Probabilities to Assess Word Complexity11 Apr 2024
- 2023Personalized Jargon Identification for Enhanced Interdisciplinary Communication16 Nov 2023
- 2023Japanese Lexical Complexity for Non-Native Readers: A New Dataset30 Jun 2023
- 2023Dancing Between Success and Failure: Edit-level Simplification Evaluation using SALSA23 May 2023
- 2023Deep Learning Approaches to Lexical Simplification: A Survey19 May 2023