mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Difficult for Whom? A Study of Japanese Lexical Complexity

arXiv 2410.18567 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The tasks of lexical complexity prediction (LCP) and complex word identification (CWI) commonly presuppose that difficult to understand words are shared by the target population. Meanwhile, personalization methods have also been proposed to adapt models to individual needs. We verify that a recent Japanese LCP dataset is representative of its target population by partially replicating the annotation. By another reannotation we show that native Chinese speakers perceive the complexity differently due to Sino-Japanese vocabulary. To explore the possibilities of personalization, we compare competitive baselines trained on the group mean ratings and individual ratings in terms of performance for an individual. We show that the model trained on a group mean performs similarly to an individual model in the CWI task, while achieving good LCP performance for an individual is difficult. We also experiment with adapting a finetuned BERT model, which results only in marginal improvements across all settings.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2024.

Builds on

5 of 27 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018A Report on the Complex Word Identification Shared Task 2018cited by 30
  2. 2020CompLex: A New Corpus for Lexical Complexity Prediction from Likert Scale Datacited by 24
  3. 2022One Size Does Not Fit All: The Case for Personalised Word Complexity Modelscited by 10
  4. 2023Japanese Lexical Complexity for Non-Native Readers: A New Datasetcited by 5
  5. 2024Simplifying Translations for Children: Iterative Simplification Considering Age of Acquisition with LLMscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.