mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Equity and Fairness of Bayesian Knowledge Tracing

arXiv 2205.02333 ↗First posted 4 May 2022cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the equity and fairness of curricula derived from Knowledge Tracing models. We begin by defining a unifying notion of an equitable tutoring system as a system that achieves maximum possible knowledge in minimal time for each student interacting with it. Realizing perfect equity requires tutoring systems that can provide individualized curricula per student. In particular, we investigate the design of equitable tutoring systems that derive their curricula from Knowledge Tracing models. We first show that many existing models, including classical Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) and Deep Knowledge Tracing (DKT), and their derived curricula can fall short of achieving equitable tutoring. To overcome this issue, we then propose a novel model, Bayesian-Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BBKT), that naturally enables online individualization and, thereby, more equitable tutoring. We demonstrate that curricula derived from our model are more effective and equitable than those derived from classical BKT models. Furthermore, we highlight that improving models with a focus on the fairness of next-step predictions might be insufficient to develop equitable tutoring systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2022.

Builds on

5 of 22 references.

References · 5

  1. 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 328
  2. 2020Algorithmic Fairness in Educationcited by 44
  3. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Education: Opportunities and Challengescited by 25
  4. 2022Fairness Amidst Non-IID Graph Data: A Literature Reviewcited by 20
  5. 2020Evaluation of Fairness Trade-offs in Predicting Student Successcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.