Unsupervised Identification of Translationese
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Translated texts are distinctively different from original ones, to the extent that supervised text classification methods can distinguish between them with high accuracy. These differences were proven useful for statistical machine translation. However, it has been suggested that the accuracy of translation detection deteriorates when the classifier is evaluated outside the domain it was trained on. We show that this is indeed the case, in a variety of evaluation scenarios. We then show that unsupervised classification is highly accurate on this task. We suggest a method for determining the correct labels of the clustering outcomes, and then use the labels for voting, improving the accuracy even further. Moreover, we suggest a simple method for clustering in the challenging case of mixed-domain datasets, in spite of the dominance of domain-related features over translation-related ones. The result is an effective, fully-unsupervised method for distinguishing between original and translated texts that can be applied to new domains with reasonable accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024High-Dimension Human Value Representation in Large Language Modelscited by 20
- 2021Comparing Feature-Engineering and Feature-Learning Approaches for Multilingual Translationese Classificationcited by 13
- 2022Original or Translated? A Causal Analysis of the Impact of Translationese on Machine Translation Performancecited by 11
- 2022PreQuEL: Quality Estimation of Machine Translation Outputs in Advancecited by 9
- 2022Explaining Translationese: why are Neural Classifiers Better and what do they Learn?cited by 5
- 2023Measuring Spurious Correlation in Classification: 'Clever Hans' in Translationesecited by 5
- 2024Towards Tailored Recovery of Lexical Diversity in Literary Machine Translationcited by 5
- 2021Automatic Classification of Human Translation and Machine Translation: A Study from the Perspective of Lexical Diversitycited by 4
- 2021Language Lexicons for Hindi-English Multilingual Text Processingcited by 0
- 2024Towards Tailored Recovery of Lexical Diversity in Literary Machine Translation30 Aug 2024
- 2024High-Dimension Human Value Representation in Large Language Models11 Apr 2024
- 2023Measuring Spurious Correlation in Classification: 'Clever Hans' in Translationese25 Aug 2023
- 2022Explaining Translationese: why are Neural Classifiers Better and what do they Learn?24 Oct 2022
- 2022PreQuEL: Quality Estimation of Machine Translation Outputs in Advance18 May 2022
- 2022Original or Translated? A Causal Analysis of the Impact of Translationese on Machine Translation Performance4 May 2022
- 2021Comparing Feature-Engineering and Feature-Learning Approaches for Multilingual Translationese Classification15 Sep 2021
- 2021Language Lexicons for Hindi-English Multilingual Text Processing29 Jun 2021
- 2021Automatic Classification of Human Translation and Machine Translation: A Study from the Perspective of Lexical Diversity10 May 2021