mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Using Monolingual Data in Neural Machine Translation: a Systematic Study

arXiv 1903.11437 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2019cs.CLcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural Machine Translation (MT) has radically changed the way systems are developed. A major difference with the previous generation (Phrase-Based MT) is the way monolingual target data, which often abounds, is used in these two paradigms. While Phrase-Based MT can seamlessly integrate very large language models trained on billions of sentences, the best option for Neural MT developers seems to be the generation of artificial parallel data through textslback-translation - a technique that fails to fully take advantage of existing datasets. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study of back-translation, comparing alternative uses of monolingual data, as well as multiple data generation procedures. Our findings confirm that back-translation is very effective and give new explanations as to why this is the case. We also introduce new data simulation techniques that are almost as effective, yet much cheaper to implement.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Domain Adaptation and Multi-Domain Adaptation for Neural Machine Translation: A Surveycited by 46
  2. 2021Language Modeling, Lexical Translation, Reordering: The Training Process of NMT through the Lens of Classical SMTcited by 21
  3. 2022Domain-Specific Text Generation for Machine Translationcited by 12
  4. 2025Understanding In-Context Machine Translation for Low-Resource Languages: A Case Study on Manchucited by 12
  5. 2022Original or Translated? A Causal Analysis of the Impact of Translationese on Machine Translation Performancecited by 11
  6. 2025Lost in Literalism: How Supervised Training Shapes Translationese in LLMscited by 11
  7. 2024NewTerm: Benchmarking Real-Time New Terms for Large Language Models with Annual Updatescited by 7
  8. 2021Code Generation from Natural Language with Less Prior and More Monolingual Datacited by 6
  9. 2021Crowdsourced Phrase-Based Tokenization for Low-Resourced Neural Machine Translation: The Case of Fon Languagecited by 6
  10. 2023PuoBERTa: Training and evaluation of a curated language model for Setswanacited by 6
  11. 2022Exploring Diversity in Back Translation for Low-Resource Machine Translationcited by 5
  12. 2024Rule-Based, Neural and LLM Back-Translation: Comparative Insights from a Variant of Ladincited by 5
9 more
  1. 2021Exploring Unsupervised Pretraining Objectives for Machine Translationcited by 3
  2. 2021HintedBT: Augmenting Back-Translation with Quality and Transliteration Hintscited by 3
  3. 2021How Low is Too Low? A Computational Perspective on Extremely Low-Resource Languagescited by 2
  4. 2023Leveraging Synthetic Targets for Machine Translationcited by 1
  5. 2025TopXGen: Topic-Diverse Parallel Data Generation for Low-Resource Machine Translationcited by 1
  6. 2026Translation Asymmetry in LLMs as a Data Augmentation Factor: A Case Study for 6 Romansh Language Varietiescited by 1
  7. 2021Empirical Analysis of Korean Public AI Hub Parallel Corpora and in-depth Analysis using LIWCcited by 0
  8. 2025Improving Retrieval-Augmented Neural Machine Translation with Monolingual Datacited by 0
  9. 2026Evaluating In-Context Translation with Synchronous Context-Free Grammar Transductioncited by 0