Are All the Datasets in Benchmark Necessary? A Pilot Study of Dataset Evaluation for Text Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we ask the research question of whether all the datasets in the benchmark are necessary. We approach this by first characterizing the distinguishability of datasets when comparing different systems. Experiments on 9 datasets and 36 systems show that several existing benchmark datasets contribute little to discriminating top-scoring systems, while those less used datasets exhibit impressive discriminative power. We further, taking the text classification task as a case study, investigate the possibility of predicting dataset discrimination based on its properties (e.g., average sentence length). Our preliminary experiments promisingly show that given a sufficient number of training experimental records, a meaningful predictor can be learned to estimate dataset discrimination over unseen datasets. We released all datasets with features explored in this work on DataLab: urlhttps://datalab.nlpedia.ai.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2022.
Builds on
22 of 60 references.
References · 22
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
- 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 738
10 more
- 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 331
- 2017A Structured Self-attentive Sentence Embeddingcited by 318
- 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
- 2021What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?cited by 200
- 2020Extractive Summarization as Text Matchingcited by 189
- 2021XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluationcited by 167
- 2020Predicting Performance for Natural Language Processing Taskscited by 49
- 2020Rethinking Generalization of Neural Models: A Named Entity Recognition Case Studycited by 35
- 2021Towards More Fine-grained and Reliable NLP Performance Predictioncited by 26
- 2022DataLab: A Platform for Data Analysis and Interventioncited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.