mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AGIC: Approximate Gradient Inversion Attack on Federated Learning

arXiv 2204.13784 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.DCcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning is a private-by-design distributed learning paradigm where clients train local models on their own data before a central server aggregates their local updates to compute a global model. Depending on the aggregation method used, the local updates are either the gradients or the weights of local learning models. Recent reconstruction attacks apply a gradient inversion optimization on the gradient update of a single minibatch to reconstruct the private data used by clients during training. As the state-of-the-art reconstruction attacks solely focus on single update, realistic adversarial scenarios are overlooked, such as observation across multiple updates and updates trained from multiple mini-batches. A few studies consider a more challenging adversarial scenario where only model updates based on multiple mini-batches are observable, and resort to computationally expensive simulation to untangle the underlying samples for each local step. In this paper, we propose AGIC, a novel Approximate Gradient Inversion Attack that efficiently and effectively reconstructs images from both model or gradient updates, and across multiple epochs. In a nutshell, AGIC (i) approximates gradient updates of used training samples from model updates to avoid costly simulation procedures, (ii) leverages gradient/model updates collected from multiple epochs, and (iii) assigns increasing weights to layers with respect to the neural network structure for reconstruction quality. We extensively evaluate AGIC on three datasets, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet. Our results show that AGIC increases the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) by up to 50% compared to two representative state-of-the-art gradient inversion attacks. Furthermore, AGIC is faster than the state-of-the-art simulation based attack, e.g., it is 5x faster when attacking FedAvg with 8 local steps in between model updates.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2022.

Builds on

23 of 33 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  5. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  6. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  7. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  8. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  9. 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
  10. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
  11. 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 625
  12. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
11 more
  1. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 367
  2. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
  3. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 320
  4. 2018Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learningcited by 242
  5. 2017Private federated learning on vertically partitioned data via entity resolution and additively homomorphic encryptioncited by 174
  6. 2016Designing Energy-Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks using Energy-Aware Pruningcited by 133
  7. 2021Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Priorcited by 101
  8. 2020R-GAP: Recursive Gradient Attack on Privacycited by 95
  9. 2021Towards General Deep Leakage in Federated Learningcited by 40
  10. 2020To Filter Prune, or to Layer Prune, That Is The Questioncited by 23
  11. 2021Revealing and Protecting Labels in Distributed Trainingcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Provable Privacy Advantages of Decentralized Federated Learning via Distributed Optimizationcited by 6
  2. 2023Temporal Gradient Inversion Attacks with Robust Optimizationcited by 4
  3. 2023Approximate and Weighted Data Reconstruction Attack in Federated Learningcited by 4
  4. 2025From Centralized to Decentralized Federated Learning: Theoretical Insights, Privacy Preservation, and Robustness Challengescited by 4
  5. 2023SRATTA : Sample Re-ATTribution Attack of Secure Aggregation in Federated Learningcited by 3
  6. 2024AFGI: Towards Accurate and Fast-convergent Gradient Inversion Attack in Federated Learningcited by 2
  7. 2024Asynchronous Multi-Server Federated Learning for Geo-Distributed Clientscited by 2
  8. 2025Shadow defense against gradient inversion attack in federated learningcited by 2
  9. 2024MGIC: A Multi-Label Gradient Inversion Attack based on Canny Edge Detection on Federated Learningcited by 1
  10. 2024Gradient Inversion of Federated Diffusion Modelscited by 1
  11. 2025TS-Inverse: A Gradient Inversion Attack Tailored for Federated Time Series Forecasting Modelscited by 0
  12. 2025TimberStrike: Dataset Reconstruction Attack Revealing Privacy Leakage in Federated Tree-Based Systemscited by 0
3 more
  1. 2025VFEFL: Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning against Malicious Clients via Verifiable Functional Encryptioncited by 0
  2. 2026Dynamic Topology Optimization for Non-IID Data in Decentralized Learningcited by 0
  3. 2026When Topology Betrays Privacy: Lattice-Based Reconstruction Attacks on Secure Aggregation in Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 0