mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MGIC: A Multi-Label Gradient Inversion Attack based on Canny Edge Detection on Federated Learning

arXiv 2403.08284 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As a new distributed computing framework that can protect data privacy, federated learning (FL) has attracted more and more attention in recent years. It receives gradients from users to train the global model and releases the trained global model to working users. Nonetheless, the gradient inversion (GI) attack reflects the risk of privacy leakage in federated learning. Attackers only need to use gradients through hundreds of thousands of simple iterations to obtain relatively accurate private data stored on users' local devices. For this, some works propose simple but effective strategies to obtain user data under a single-label dataset. However, these strategies induce a satisfactory visual effect of the inversion image at the expense of higher time costs. Due to the semantic limitation of a single label, the image obtained by gradient inversion may have semantic errors. We present a novel gradient inversion strategy based on canny edge detection (MGIC) in both the multi-label and single-label datasets. To reduce semantic errors caused by a single label, we add new convolution layers' blocks in the trained model to obtain the image's multi-label. Through multi-label representation, serious semantic errors in inversion images are reduced. Then, we analyze the impact of parameters on the difficulty of input image reconstruction and discuss how image multi-subjects affect the inversion performance. Our proposed strategy has better visual inversion image results than the most widely used ones, saving more than 78% of time costs in the ImageNet dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2024.

Builds on

20 of 34 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  3. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  4. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
  5. 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 389
  6. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 367
  7. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 320
  8. 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 197
  9. 2020Threats to Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 171
  10. 2017Revisiting Distributed Synchronous SGDcited by 142
  11. 2021Re-labeling ImageNet: from Single to Multi-Labels, from Global to Localized Labelscited by 117
  12. 2019Learning Semantic-Specific Graph Representation for Multi-Label Image Recognitioncited by 116
8 more
  1. 2021Can multi-label classification networks know what they don't know?cited by 100
  2. 2020R-GAP: Recursive Gradient Attack on Privacycited by 95
  3. 2020A Framework for Evaluating Gradient Leakage Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 63
  4. 2020MLRSNet: A Multi-label High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Dataset for Semantic Scene Understandingcited by 59
  5. 2020Learning to Discover Multi-Class Attentional Regions for Multi-Label Image Recognitioncited by 50
  6. 2022Do Gradient Inversion Attacks Make Federated Learning Unsafe?cited by 44
  7. 2021Understanding Training-Data Leakage from Gradients in Neural Networks for Image Classificationcited by 16
  8. 2022AGIC: Approximate Gradient Inversion Attack on Federated Learningcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.