Cross Pairwise Ranking for Unbiased Item Recommendation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most recommender systems optimize the model on observed interaction data, which is affected by the previous exposure mechanism and exhibits many biases like popularity bias. The loss functions, such as the mostly used pointwise Binary Cross-Entropy and pairwise Bayesian Personalized Ranking, are not designed to consider the biases in observed data. As a result, the model optimized on the loss would inherit the data biases, or even worse, amplify the biases. For example, a few popular items take up more and more exposure opportunities, severely hurting the recommendation quality on niche items -- known as the notorious Mathew effect. In this work, we develop a new learning paradigm named Cross Pairwise Ranking (CPR) that achieves unbiased recommendation without knowing the exposure mechanism. Distinct from inverse propensity scoring (IPS), we change the loss term of a sample -- we innovatively sample multiple observed interactions once and form the loss as the combination of their predictions. We prove in theory that this way offsets the influence of user/item propensity on the learning, removing the influence of data biases caused by the exposure mechanism. Advantageous to IPS, our proposed CPR ensures unbiased learning for each training instance without the need of setting the propensity scores. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of CPR over state-of-the-art debiasing solutions in both model generalization and training efficiency. The codes are available at https://github.com/Qcactus/CPR.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2022.
Builds on
24 of 45 references.
References · 24
- 2020LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendationcited by 1,134
- 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
- 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 745
- 2019Neural Graph Collaborative Filteringcited by 660
- 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 308
- 2020Self-supervised Graph Learning for Recommendationcited by 305
- 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
- 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 239
- 2022Discovering Invariant Rationales for Graph Neural Networkscited by 186
- 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
- 2021Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 116
- 2020Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemcited by 94
12 more
- 2019Managing Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems with Personalized Re-rankingcited by 81
- 2017Causal Embeddings for Recommendationcited by 79
- 2019Unbiased Recommender Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Implicit Feedbackcited by 79
- 2021AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendationcited by 68
- 2019POG: Personalized Outfit Generation for Fashion Recommendation at Alibaba iFashioncited by 63
- 2020Clicks can be Cheating: Counterfactual Recommendation for Mitigating Clickbait Issuecited by 48
- 2020ESAM: Discriminative Domain Adaptation with Non-Displayed Items to Improve Long-Tail Performancecited by 30
- 2020Multi-sided Exposure Bias in Recommendationcited by 23
- 2020SetRank: A Setwise Bayesian Approach for Collaborative Ranking from Implicit Feedbackcited by 15
- 2018Fast Matrix Factorization with Non-Uniform Weights on Missing Datacited by 12
- 2021Debiased Explainable Pairwise Ranking from Implicit Feedbackcited by 7
- 2021Set2setRank: Collaborative Set to Set Ranking for Implicit Feedback based Recommendationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 6; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023A Survey on Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 42
- 2023RAH! RecSys-Assistant-Human: A Human-Centered Recommendation Framework with LLM Agentscited by 30
- 2023On the Theories Behind Hard Negative Sampling for Recommendationcited by 18
- 2023A Survey on Fairness-aware Recommender Systemscited by 14
- 2025Unbiased Collaborative Filtering with Fair Samplingcited by 6
- 2022Reconsidering Learning Objectives in Unbiased Recommendation with Unobserved Confounderscited by 0
- 2023Preference or Intent? Double Disentangled Collaborative Filteringcited by 0
- 2023DPR: An Algorithm Mitigate Bias Accumulation in Recommendation feedback loopscited by 0
- 2025Unbiased Collaborative Filtering with Fair Sampling19 Feb 2025
- 2023DPR: An Algorithm Mitigate Bias Accumulation in Recommendation feedback loops10 Nov 2023
- 2023RAH! RecSys-Assistant-Human: A Human-Centered Recommendation Framework with LLM Agents19 Aug 2023
- 2023A Survey on Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems2 Aug 2023
- 2023A Survey on Fairness-aware Recommender Systems1 Jun 2023
- 2023Preference or Intent? Double Disentangled Collaborative Filtering18 May 2023
- 2023On the Theories Behind Hard Negative Sampling for Recommendation7 Feb 2023
- 2022Reconsidering Learning Objectives in Unbiased Recommendation with Unobserved Confounders7 Jun 2022