mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Supervised Video Object Segmentation via Cutout Prediction and Tagging

arXiv 2204.10846 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2022cs.CV eess.IVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a novel self-supervised Video Object Segmentation (VOS) approach that strives to achieve better object-background discriminability for accurate object segmentation. Distinct from previous self-supervised VOS methods, our approach is based on a discriminative learning loss formulation that takes into account both object and background information to ensure object-background discriminability, rather than using only object appearance. The discriminative learning loss comprises cutout-based reconstruction (cutout region represents part of a frame, whose pixels are replaced with some constant values) and tag prediction loss terms. The cutout-based reconstruction term utilizes a simple cutout scheme to learn the pixel-wise correspondence between the current and previous frames in order to reconstruct the original current frame with added cutout region in it. The introduced cutout patch guides the model to focus as much on the significant features of the object of interest as the less significant ones, thereby implicitly equipping the model to address occlusion-based scenarios. Next, the tag prediction term encourages object-background separability by grouping tags of all pixels in the cutout region that are similar, while separating them from the tags of the rest of the reconstructed frame pixels. Additionally, we introduce a zoom-in scheme that addresses the problem of small object segmentation by capturing fine structural information at multiple scales. Our proposed approach, termed CT-VOS, achieves state-of-the-art results on two challenging benchmarks: DAVIS-2017 and Youtube-VOS. A detailed ablation showcases the importance of the proposed loss formulation to effectively capture object-background discriminability and the impact of our zoom-in scheme to accurately segment small-sized objects.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2022.

Builds on

42 of 58 references.

References · 42

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  8. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
  9. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,379
  10. 2015Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Predictioncited by 1,062
  11. 2017The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentationcited by 942
  12. 2019PANet: Few-Shot Image Semantic Segmentation with Prototype Alignmentcited by 449
30 more
  1. 2019Video Object Segmentation using Space-Time Memory Networkscited by 436
  2. 2018YouTube-VOS: A Large-Scale Video Object Segmentation Benchmarkcited by 381
  3. 2017One-Shot Learning for Semantic Segmentationcited by 337
  4. 2018Fast Online Object Tracking and Segmentation: A Unifying Approachcited by 272
  5. 2019Learning Correspondence from the Cycle-Consistency of Timecited by 269
  6. 2020Space-Time Correspondence as a Contrastive Random Walkcited by 239
  7. 2016One-Shot Video Object Segmentationcited by 233
  8. 2018YouTube-VOS: Sequence-to-Sequence Video Object Segmentationcited by 228
  9. 2019CANet: Class-Agnostic Segmentation Networks with Iterative Refinement and Attentive Few-Shot Learningcited by 217
  10. 2019FEELVOS: Fast End-to-End Embedding Learning for Video Object Segmentationcited by 178
  11. 2019Video Representation Learning by Dense Predictive Codingcited by 175
  12. 2018Tracking Emerges by Colorizing Videoscited by 166
  13. 2016Learning Video Object Segmentation from Static Imagescited by 151
  14. 2018Self-Supervised Video Representation Learning with Space-Time Cubic Puzzlescited by 149
  15. 2021Self-supervised Video Object Segmentation by Motion Groupingcited by 147
  16. 2017Online Adaptation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Video Object Segmentationcited by 109
  17. 2020MAST: A Memory-Augmented Self-supervised Trackercited by 109
  18. 2021SSTVOS: Sparse Spatiotemporal Transformers for Video Object Segmentationcited by 106
  19. 2018Efficient Video Object Segmentation via Network Modulationcited by 98
  20. 2017Video Object Segmentation Without Temporal Informationcited by 93
  21. 2019RVOS: End-to-End Recurrent Network for Video Object Segmentationcited by 88
  22. 2021Efficient Regional Memory Network for Video Object Segmentationcited by 86
  23. 2018PReMVOS: Proposal-generation, Refinement and Merging for Video Object Segmentationcited by 81
  24. 2019Joint-task Self-supervised Learning for Temporal Correspondencecited by 80
  25. 2018Blazingly Fast Video Object Segmentation with Pixel-Wise Metric Learningcited by 74
  26. 2017Learning Video Object Segmentation with Visual Memorycited by 66
  27. 2021Learning Position and Target Consistency for Memory-based Video Object Segmentationcited by 63
  28. 2018Video Object Segmentation with Joint Re-identification and Attention-Aware Mask Propagationcited by 56
  29. 2019CapsuleVOS: Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation Using Capsule Routingcited by 29
  30. 2020Self-supervised Video Object Segmentationcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.