Can Foundation Models Help Us Achieve Perfect Secrecy?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A key promise of machine learning is the ability to assist users with personal tasks. Because the personal context required to make accurate predictions is often sensitive, we require systems that protect privacy. A gold standard privacy-preserving system will satisfy perfect secrecy, meaning that interactions with the system provably reveal no private information. However, privacy and quality appear to be in tension in existing systems for personal tasks. Neural models typically require copious amounts of training to perform well, while individual users typically hold a limited scale of data, so federated learning (FL) systems propose to learn from the aggregate data of multiple users. FL does not provide perfect secrecy, but rather practitioners apply statistical notions of privacy -- i.e., the probability of learning private information about a user should be reasonably low. The strength of the privacy guarantee is governed by privacy parameters. Numerous privacy attacks have been demonstrated on FL systems and it can be challenging to reason about the appropriate privacy parameters for a privacy-sensitive use case. Therefore our work proposes a simple baseline for FL, which both provides the stronger perfect secrecy guarantee and does not require setting any privacy parameters. We initiate the study of when and where an emerging tool in ML -- the in-context learning abilities of recent pretrained models -- can be an effective baseline alongside FL. We find in-context learning is competitive with strong FL baselines on 6 of 7 popular benchmarks from the privacy literature and a real-world case study, which is disjoint from the pretraining data. We release our code here: https://github.com/simran-arora/focus
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 102 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2022.
Builds on
60 of 102 references.
References · 60
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
38 more
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2020Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalizationcited by 672
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
- 2019Federated Learning with Personalization Layerscited by 541
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
- 2022Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with Languagecited by 513
- 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 412
- 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 400
- 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 384
- 2021ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Trainingcited by 341
- 2020FedML: A Research Library and Benchmark for Federated Machine Learningcited by 300
- 2022PromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Promptscited by 289
- 2021AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Promptscited by 268
- 2021ZeRO-Infinity: Breaking the GPU Memory Wall for Extreme Scale Deep Learningcited by 256
- 2020On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselinescited by 255
- 2021Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 214
- 2017EMNIST: an extension of MNIST to handwritten letterscited by 213
- 2019MRQA 2019 Shared Task: Evaluating Generalization in Reading Comprehensioncited by 184
- 2020FetchSGD: Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Sketchingcited by 179
- 2021Reframing Instructional Prompts to GPTk's Languagecited by 176
- 2021FedScale: Benchmarking Model and System Performance of Federated Learning at Scalecited by 136
50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2022Ask Me Anything: A simple strategy for prompting language modelscited by 155
- 2022Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretrainingcited by 88
- 2025Cartridges: Lightweight and general-purpose long context representations via self-studycited by 86
- 2026Training Transformers for KV Cache Compressibilitycited by 7
- 2023On the Benefits of Public Representations for Private Transfer Learning under Distribution Shiftcited by 5
- 2025Understanding Private Learning From Feature Perspectivecited by 3
- 2025Learned Structure in Cartridges: Keys as Shareable Routers in Self-Studied Representationscited by 2
- 2025Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shiftcited by 0
- 2026ContinuousBench: Can Differentially Private Synthetic Text Improve Capabilities?cited by 0
- 2026ContinuousBench: Can Differentially Private Synthetic Text Improve Capabilities?1 Jun 2026
- 2026Training Transformers for KV Cache Compressibility7 May 2026
- 2025Understanding Private Learning From Feature Perspective22 Nov 2025
- 2025Learned Structure in Cartridges: Keys as Shareable Routers in Self-Studied Representations23 Aug 2025
- 2025Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shift23 Jul 2025
- 2025Cartridges: Lightweight and general-purpose long context representations via self-study6 Jun 2025
- 2023On the Benefits of Public Representations for Private Transfer Learning under Distribution Shift24 Dec 2023
- 2022Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretraining13 Dec 2022
- 2022Ask Me Anything: A simple strategy for prompting language models5 Oct 2022