mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Incorporating Semi-Supervised and Positive-Unlabeled Learning for Boosting Full Reference Image Quality Assessment

arXiv 2204.08763 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2022cs.CV eess.IVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Full-reference (FR) image quality assessment (IQA) evaluates the visual quality of a distorted image by measuring its perceptual difference with pristine-quality reference, and has been widely used in low-level vision tasks. Pairwise labeled data with mean opinion score (MOS) are required in training FR-IQA model, but is time-consuming and cumbersome to collect. In contrast, unlabeled data can be easily collected from an image degradation or restoration process, making it encouraging to exploit unlabeled training data to boost FR-IQA performance. Moreover, due to the distribution inconsistency between labeled and unlabeled data, outliers may occur in unlabeled data, further increasing the training difficulty. In this paper, we suggest to incorporate semi-supervised and positive-unlabeled (PU) learning for exploiting unlabeled data while mitigating the adverse effect of outliers. Particularly, by treating all labeled data as positive samples, PU learning is leveraged to identify negative samples (i.e., outliers) from unlabeled data. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) is further deployed to exploit positive unlabeled data by dynamically generating pseudo-MOS. We adopt a dual-branch network including reference and distortion branches. Furthermore, spatial attention is introduced in the reference branch to concentrate more on the informative regions, and sliced Wasserstein distance is used for robust difference map computation to address the misalignment issues caused by images recovered by GAN models. Extensive experiments show that our method performs favorably against state-of-the-arts on the benchmark datasets PIPAL, KADID-10k, TID2013, LIVE and CSIQ.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2022.

Builds on

27 of 86 references.

References · 27

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  4. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  5. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  6. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
  7. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 792
  8. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  9. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 301
  10. 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 224
  11. 2020CycleISP: Real Image Restoration via Improved Data Synthesiscited by 212
  12. 2020PIPAL: a Large-Scale Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Perceptual Image Restorationcited by 177
15 more
  1. 2018PieAPP: Perceptual Image-Error Assessment through Pairwise Preferencecited by 158
  2. 2018The 2018 PIRM Challenge on Perceptual Image Super-resolutioncited by 155
  3. 2016Learning a No-Reference Quality Metric for Single-Image Super-Resolutioncited by 143
  4. 2016Perceptual Quality Prediction on Authentically Distorted Images Using a Bag of Features Approachcited by 71
  5. 2021Perceptual Image Quality Assessment with Transformerscited by 54
  6. 2020Self-PU: Self Boosted and Calibrated Positive-Unlabeled Trainingcited by 47
  7. 2020Projected Distribution Loss for Image Enhancementcited by 29
  8. 2020Image Quality Assessment for Perceptual Image Restoration: A New Dataset, Benchmark and Metriccited by 26
  9. 2021NTIRE 2021 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 18
  10. 2015Geodesics of learned representationscited by 14
  11. 2021Region-Adaptive Deformable Network for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 14
  12. 2020Semi-Supervised Learning for Fetal Brain MRI Quality Assessment with ROI consistencycited by 10
  13. 2021(ASNA) An Attention-based Siamese-Difference Neural Network with Surrogate Ranking Loss function for Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 7
  14. 2021Semi-Supervised Deep Ensembles for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 6
  15. 2019Real-Time Quality Assessment of Pediatric MRI via Semi-Supervised Deep Nonlocal Residual Neural Networkscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

12 papers.