mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Image Quality Assessment for Perceptual Image Restoration: A New Dataset, Benchmark and Metric

arXiv 2011.15002 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2020eess.IV cs.CVcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image quality assessment (IQA) is the key factor for the fast development of image restoration (IR) algorithms. The most recent perceptual IR algorithms based on generative adversarial networks (GANs) have brought in significant improvement on visual performance, but also pose great challenges for quantitative evaluation. Notably, we observe an increasing inconsistency between perceptual quality and the evaluation results. We present two questions: Can existing IQA methods objectively evaluate recent IR algorithms? With the focus on beating current benchmarks, are we getting better IR algorithms? To answer the questions and promote the development of IQA methods, we contribute a large-scale IQA dataset, called Perceptual Image Processing ALgorithms (PIPAL) dataset. Especially, this dataset includes the results of GAN-based IR algorithms, which are missing in previous datasets. We collect more than 1.13 million human judgments to assign subjective scores for PIPAL images using the more reliable Elo system. Based on PIPAL, we present new benchmarks for both IQA and SR methods. Our results indicate that existing IQA methods cannot fairly evaluate GAN-based IR algorithms. While using appropriate evaluation methods is important, IQA methods should also be updated along with the development of IR algorithms. At last, we shed light on how to improve the IQA performance on GAN-based distortion. Inspired by the find that the existing IQA methods have an unsatisfactory performance on the GAN-based distortion partially because of their low tolerance to spatial misalignment, we propose to improve the performance of an IQA network on GAN-based distortion by explicitly considering this misalignment. We propose the Space Warping Difference Network, which includes the novel l_2 pooling layers and Space Warping Difference layers. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 6; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

26 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Depicting Beyond Scores: Advancing Image Quality Assessment through Multi-modal Language Modelscited by 104
  2. 2023Masked Image Training for Generalizable Deep Image Denoisingcited by 57
  3. 2021Perceptual Image Quality Assessment with Transformerscited by 54
  4. 2023Sparse Sampling Transformer with Uncertainty-Driven Ranking for Unified Removal of Raindrops and Rain Streakscited by 45
  5. 2021Learning Conditional Knowledge Distillation for Degraded-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 41
  6. 2022NTIRE 2022 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 41
  7. 2024RestoreAgent: Autonomous Image Restoration Agent via Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 41
  8. 2022PyTorch Image Quality: Metrics for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 34
  9. 2025Harnessing Diffusion-Yielded Score Priors for Image Restorationcited by 34
  10. 2024Low-Res Leads the Way: Improving Generalization for Super-Resolution by Self-Supervised Learningcited by 19
  11. 2021NTIRE 2021 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 18
  12. 2021Region-Adaptive Deformable Network for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 14
14 more
  1. 2022Incorporating Semi-Supervised and Positive-Unlabeled Learning for Boosting Full Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 12
  2. 2024Exploring Vulnerabilities of No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Models: A Query-Based Black-Box Methodcited by 10
  3. 2021(ASNA) An Attention-based Siamese-Difference Neural Network with Surrogate Ranking Loss function for Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 7
  4. 2024Diffusion Model Based Visual Compensation Guidance and Visual Difference Analysis for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 6
  5. 2022Conformer and Blind Noisy Students for Improved Image Quality Assessmentcited by 5
  6. 2021Human Imperceptible Attacks and Applications to Improve Fairnesscited by 3
  7. 2025Position: Agentic Systems Constitute a Key Component of Next-Generation Intelligent Image Processingcited by 3
  8. 2025Perception-oriented Bidirectional Attention Network for Image Super-resolution Quality Assessmentcited by 2
  9. 2022Can No-reference features help in Full-reference image quality estimation?cited by 1
  10. 2022Multi-Scale Features and Parallel Transformers Based Image Quality Assessmentcited by 1
  11. 2026The Limits of Reference-Free Speech Quality Metrics as Evaluators and Rewards on Modern Text-to-Speechcited by 1
  12. 2021Two-stage domain adapted training for better generalization in real-world image restoration and super-resolutioncited by 0
  13. 2025AdaQual-Diff: Diffusion-Based Image Restoration via Adaptive Quality Promptingcited by 0
  14. 2026EvoIQA - Explaining Image Distortions with Evolved White-Box Logiccited by 0