Estimating Structural Disparities for Face Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In machine learning, disparity metrics are often defined by measuring the difference in the performance or outcome of a model, across different sub-populations (groups) of datapoints. Thus, the inputs to disparity quantification consist of a model's predictions haty, the ground-truth labels for the predictions y, and group labels g for the data points. Performance of the model for each group is calculated by comparing haty and y for the datapoints within a specific group, and as a result, disparity of performance across the different groups can be calculated. In many real world scenarios however, group labels (g) may not be available at scale during training and validation time, or collecting them might not be feasible or desirable as they could often be sensitive information. As a result, evaluating disparity metrics across categorical groups would not be feasible. On the other hand, in many scenarios noisy groupings may be obtainable using some form of a proxy, which would allow measuring disparity metrics across sub-populations. Here we explore performing such analysis on computer vision models trained on human faces, and on tasks such as face attribute prediction and affect estimation. Our experiments indicate that embeddings resulting from an off-the-shelf face recognition model, could meaningfully serve as a proxy for such estimation.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2022.
Builds on
21 of 38 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 914
- 2017AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wildcited by 492
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
- 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2019Expression, Affect, Action Unit Recognition: Aff-Wild2, Multi-Task Learning and ArcFacecited by 222
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
9 more
- 2018FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 164
- 2020Ethical Machine Learning in Health Carecited by 113
- 2019Context-Aware Emotion Recognition Networkscited by 99
- 2018Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobservedcited by 94
- 2017Shake-Shake regularizationcited by 87
- 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
- 2020Context Based Emotion Recognition using EMOTIC Datasetcited by 73
- 2020M3T: Multi-Modal Continuous Valence-Arousal Estimation in the Wildcited by 14
- 2017Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Age Estimation based on VGG-Face Modelcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Zero-shot Visual Commonsense Immorality Predictioncited by 2
- 2023Improving Identity-Robustness for Face Modelscited by 2
- 2023LLM2Loss: Leveraging Language Models for Explainable Model Diagnosticscited by 0
- 2026Bias Mitigation in Face Recognition via Demographic-based Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 0
- 2026Bias Mitigation in Face Recognition via Demographic-based Supervised Contrastive Learning13 Aug 2026
- 2023LLM2Loss: Leveraging Language Models for Explainable Model Diagnostics4 May 2023
- 2023Improving Identity-Robustness for Face Models7 Apr 2023
- 2022Zero-shot Visual Commonsense Immorality Prediction10 Nov 2022