Improving Identity-Robustness for Face Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the success of deep-learning models in many tasks, there have been concerns about such models learning shortcuts, and their lack of robustness to irrelevant confounders. When it comes to models directly trained on human faces, a sensitive confounder is that of human identities. Many face-related tasks should ideally be identity-independent, and perform uniformly across different individuals (i.e. be fair). One way to measure and enforce such robustness and performance uniformity is through enforcing it during training, assuming identity-related information is available at scale. However, due to privacy concerns and also the cost of collecting such information, this is often not the case, and most face datasets simply contain input images and their corresponding task-related labels. Thus, improving identity-related robustness without the need for such annotations is of great importance. Here, we explore using face-recognition embedding vectors, as proxies for identities, to enforce such robustness. We propose to use the structure in the face-recognition embedding space, to implicitly emphasize rare samples within each class. We do so by weighting samples according to their conditional inverse density (CID) in the proxy embedding space. Our experiments suggest that such a simple sample weighting scheme, not only improves the training robustness, it often improves the overall performance as a result of such robustness. We also show that employing such constraints during training results in models that are significantly less sensitive to different levels of bias in the dataset.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2023.
Builds on
24 of 37 references.
References · 24
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2018Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Datacited by 170
- 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 145
12 more
- 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
- 2018Detailed Human Avatars from Monocular Videocited by 109
- 2018Achieving Fairness through Adversarial Learning: an Application to Recidivism Predictioncited by 77
- 2022Fair Contrastive Learning for Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 71
- 2018Facial Landmark Detection: a Literature Surveycited by 63
- 2021Fairness via Representation Neutralizationcited by 63
- 2020img2pose: Face Alignment and Detection via 6DoF, Face Pose Estimationcited by 58
- 2021On Tilted Losses in Machine Learning: Theory and Applicationscited by 43
- 2017Oversampling for Imbalanced Learning Based on K-Means and SMOTEcited by 38
- 2020Fairness and Robustness in Invariant Learning: A Case Study in Toxicity Classificationcited by 32
- 2015Learning Social Relation Traits from Face Imagescited by 25
- 2022Estimating Structural Disparities for Face Modelscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.