Network Shuffling: Privacy Amplification via Random Walks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, it is shown that shuffling can amplify the central differential privacy guarantees of data randomized with local differential privacy. Within this setup, a centralized, trusted shuffler is responsible for shuffling by keeping the identities of data anonymous, which subsequently leads to stronger privacy guarantees for systems. However, introducing a centralized entity to the originally local privacy model loses some appeals of not having any centralized entity as in local differential privacy. Moreover, implementing a shuffler in a reliable way is not trivial due to known security issues and/or requirements of advanced hardware or secure computation technology. Motivated by these practical considerations, we rethink the shuffle model to relax the assumption of requiring a centralized, trusted shuffler. We introduce network shuffling, a decentralized mechanism where users exchange data in a random-walk fashion on a network/graph, as an alternative of achieving privacy amplification via anonymity. We analyze the threat model under such a setting, and propose distributed protocols of network shuffling that is straightforward to implement in practice. Furthermore, we show that the privacy amplification rate is similar to other privacy amplification techniques such as uniform shuffling. To our best knowledge, among the recently studied intermediate trust models that leverage privacy amplification techniques, our work is the first that is not relying on any centralized entity to achieve privacy amplification.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2022.
Builds on
26 of 56 references.
References · 26
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2019Multi-scale Attributed Node Embeddingcited by 548
- 2021A Field Guide to Federated Optimizationcited by 315
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 242
- 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 164
- 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 149
- 2018Protection Against Reconstruction and Its Applications in Private Federated Learningcited by 130
- 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
14 more
- 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
- 2019The Privacy Blanket of the Shuffle Modelcited by 74
- 2020Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Trilemmacited by 68
- 2015Privacy for Free: Posterior Sampling and Stochastic Gradient Monte Carlocited by 63
- 2018GEMSEC: Graph Embedding with Self Clusteringcited by 61
- 2017Prochlo: Strong Privacy for Analytics in the Crowdcited by 51
- 2020Privacy Amplification via Random Check-Inscited by 39
- 2020Privacy Amplification by Decentralizationcited by 28
- 2020FLAME: Differentially Private Federated Learning in the Shuffle Modelcited by 27
- 2020LinkedIn's Audience Engagements API: A Privacy Preserving Data Analytics System at Scalecited by 26
- 2021Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single Messagecited by 18
- 2019Separating Local & Shuffled Differential Privacy via Histogramscited by 16
- 2020A Survey of Published Attacks on Intel SGXcited by 10
- 2017Malware Guard Extension: Using SGX to Conceal Cache Attackscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023ULDP-FL: Federated Learning with Across Silo User-Level Differential Privacycited by 9
- 2024Differentially Private Decentralized Learning with Random Walkscited by 8
- 2022Shuffle Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacycited by 4
- 2025Mitigating Privacy-Utility Trade-off in Decentralized Federated Learning via f-Differential Privacycited by 3
- 2026Analysis of Shuffling Beyond Pure Local Differential Privacycited by 1
- 2022Privacy Amplification via Shuffled Check-Inscited by 0
- 2026Analysis of Shuffling Beyond Pure Local Differential Privacy27 Jan 2026
- 2025Mitigating Privacy-Utility Trade-off in Decentralized Federated Learning via f-Differential Privacy22 Oct 2025
- 2024Differentially Private Decentralized Learning with Random Walks12 Feb 2024
- 2023ULDP-FL: Federated Learning with Across Silo User-Level Differential Privacy23 Aug 2023
- 2022Shuffle Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy20 Jun 2022
- 2022Privacy Amplification via Shuffled Check-Ins7 Jun 2022