Privacy Amplification via Shuffled Check-Ins
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study a protocol for distributed computation called shuffled check-in, which achieves strong privacy guarantees without requiring any further trust assumptions beyond a trusted shuffler. Unlike most existing work, shuffled check-in allows clients to make independent and random decisions to participate in the computation, removing the need for server-initiated subsampling. Leveraging differential privacy, we show that shuffled check-in achieves tight privacy guarantees through privacy amplification, with a novel analysis based on R'enyi differential privacy that improves privacy accounting over existing work. We also introduce a numerical approach to track the privacy of generic shuffling mechanisms, including Gaussian mechanism, which is the first evaluation of a generic mechanism under the distributed setting within the local/shuffle model in the literature. Empirical studies are also given to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2022.
Builds on
27 of 55 references.
References · 27
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 218
- 2021Federated Learning with Buffered Asynchronous Aggregationcited by 188
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
- 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 169
- 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 163
15 more
- 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 147
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
- 2020The Discrete Gaussian for Differential Privacycited by 134
- 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 127
- 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
- 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 103
- 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
- 2019Hypothesis Testing Interpretations and Renyi Differential Privacycited by 84
- 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 66
- 2017Prochlo: Strong Privacy for Analytics in the Crowdcited by 51
- 2020Encode, Shuffle, Analyze Privacy Revisited: Formalizations and Empirical Evaluationcited by 39
- 2020Privacy Amplification via Random Check-Inscited by 39
- 2020Three Variants of Differential Privacy: Lossless Conversion and Applicationscited by 25
- 2021On the Renyi Differential Privacy of the Shuffle Modelcited by 16
- 2022Network Shuffling: Privacy Amplification via Random Walkscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.