mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Privacy Amplification via Shuffled Check-Ins

arXiv 2206.03151 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study a protocol for distributed computation called shuffled check-in, which achieves strong privacy guarantees without requiring any further trust assumptions beyond a trusted shuffler. Unlike most existing work, shuffled check-in allows clients to make independent and random decisions to participate in the computation, removing the need for server-initiated subsampling. Leveraging differential privacy, we show that shuffled check-in achieves tight privacy guarantees through privacy amplification, with a novel analysis based on R'enyi differential privacy that improves privacy accounting over existing work. We also introduce a numerical approach to track the privacy of generic shuffling mechanisms, including Gaussian mechanism, which is the first evaluation of a generic mechanism under the distributed setting within the local/shuffle model in the literature. Empirical studies are also given to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2022.

Builds on

27 of 55 references.

References · 27

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  3. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  4. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
  5. 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
  6. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
  7. 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
  8. 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 218
  9. 2021Federated Learning with Buffered Asynchronous Aggregationcited by 188
  10. 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
  11. 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 169
  12. 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 163
15 more
  1. 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 147
  2. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
  3. 2020The Discrete Gaussian for Differential Privacycited by 134
  4. 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 127
  5. 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
  6. 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 103
  7. 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
  8. 2019Hypothesis Testing Interpretations and Renyi Differential Privacycited by 84
  9. 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 66
  10. 2017Prochlo: Strong Privacy for Analytics in the Crowdcited by 51
  11. 2020Encode, Shuffle, Analyze Privacy Revisited: Formalizations and Empirical Evaluationcited by 39
  12. 2020Privacy Amplification via Random Check-Inscited by 39
  13. 2020Three Variants of Differential Privacy: Lossless Conversion and Applicationscited by 25
  14. 2021On the Renyi Differential Privacy of the Shuffle Modelcited by 16
  15. 2022Network Shuffling: Privacy Amplification via Random Walkscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.