mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Differentially Private Decentralized Learning with Random Walks

arXiv 2402.07471 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.CRcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The popularity of federated learning comes from the possibility of better scalability and the ability for participants to keep control of their data, improving data security and sovereignty. Unfortunately, sharing model updates also creates a new privacy attack surface. In this work, we characterize the privacy guarantees of decentralized learning with random walk algorithms, where a model is updated by traveling from one node to another along the edges of a communication graph. Using a recent variant of differential privacy tailored to the study of decentralized algorithms, namely Pairwise Network Differential Privacy, we derive closed-form expressions for the privacy loss between each pair of nodes where the impact of the communication topology is captured by graph theoretic quantities. Our results further reveal that random walk algorithms tends to yield better privacy guarantees than gossip algorithms for nodes close from each other. We supplement our theoretical results with empirical evaluation on synthetic and real-world graphs and datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.

Builds on

27 of 54 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  3. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
  4. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  5. 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
  6. 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 361
  7. 2019Decentralized Stochastic Optimization and Gossip Algorithms with Compressed Communicationcited by 218
  8. 2018D2: Decentralized Training over Decentralized Datacited by 140
  9. 2017Network Topology and Communication-Computation Tradeoffs in Decentralized Optimizationcited by 119
  10. 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
  11. 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 97
  12. 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
15 more
  1. 2022An Improved Analysis of Gradient Tracking for Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 68
  2. 2018On Markov Chain Gradient Descentcited by 63
  3. 2023Stochastic Gradient Descent under Markovian Sampling Schemescited by 37
  4. 2022Refined Convergence and Topology Learning for Decentralized SGD with Heterogeneous Datacited by 31
  5. 2022Muffliato: Peer-to-Peer Privacy Amplification for Decentralized Optimization and Averagingcited by 27
  6. 2014Differentially Private Distributed Optimizationcited by 23
  7. 2022On the (In)security of Peer-to-Peer Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 23
  8. 2018Improving the Privacy and Accuracy of ADMM-Based Distributed Algorithmscited by 20
  9. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization in Non-interactive Local Differential Privacy: Efficiency and High Dimensional Casecited by 19
  10. 2022A principled framework for the design and analysis of token algorithmscited by 17
  11. 2017Collect at Once, Use Effectively: Making Non-interactive Locally Private Learning Possiblecited by 12
  12. 2022Network Shuffling: Privacy Amplification via Random Walkscited by 6
  13. 2023From Noisy Fixed-Point Iterations to Private ADMM for Centralized and Federated Learningcited by 5
  14. 2022Straggler-Resilient Differentially-Private Decentralized Learningcited by 3
  15. 2018Information-Theoretic Privacy in Distributed Average Consensuscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8.

8 papers.