mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hear No Evil: Towards Adversarial Robustness of Automatic Speech Recognition via Multi-Task Learning

arXiv 2204.02381 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2022eess.AS cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems are now being widely deployed in the wild, the increasing threat of adversarial attacks raises serious questions about the security and reliability of using such systems. On the other hand, multi-task learning (MTL) has shown success in training models that can resist adversarial attacks in the computer vision domain. In this work, we investigate the impact of performing such multi-task learning on the adversarial robustness of ASR models in the speech domain. We conduct extensive MTL experimentation by combining semantically diverse tasks such as accent classification and ASR, and evaluate a wide range of adversarial settings. Our thorough analysis reveals that performing MTL with semantically diverse tasks consistently makes it harder for an adversarial attack to succeed. We also discuss in detail the serious pitfalls and their related remedies that have a significant impact on the robustness of MTL models. Our proposed MTL approach shows considerable absolute improvements in adversarially targeted WER ranging from 17.25 up to 59.90 compared to single-task learning baselines (attention decoder and CTC respectively). Ours is the first in-depth study that uncovers adversarial robustness gains from multi-task learning for ASR.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2022.

Builds on

23 of 31 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2020Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognitioncited by 1,838
  4. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  5. 2018ESPnet: End-to-End Speech Processing Toolkitcited by 554
  6. 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 268
  7. 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 214
  8. 2018CommanderSong: A Systematic Approach for Practical Adversarial Voice Recognitioncited by 63
  9. 2020A General Multi-Task Learning Framework to Leverage Text Data for Speech to Text Taskscited by 51
  10. 2017Houdini: Fooling Deep Structured Prediction Modelscited by 50
  11. 2018Did you hear that? Adversarial Examples Against Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 48
  12. 2018Targeted Adversarial Examples for Black Box Audio Systemscited by 41
11 more
  1. 2018Domain Adversarial Training for Accented Speech Recognitioncited by 40
  2. 2021WaveGuard: Understanding and Mitigating Audio Adversarial Examplescited by 39
  3. 2021Why does CTC result in peaky behavior?cited by 32
  4. 2021Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Speech Recognition Systemscited by 20
  5. 2020Characterizing Speech Adversarial Examples Using Self-Attention U-Net Enhancementcited by 18
  6. 2021Best of Both Worlds: Robust Accented Speech Recognition with Adversarial Transfer Learningcited by 17
  7. 2021Adversarial Robustness in Multi-Task Learning: Promises and Illusionscited by 17
  8. 2018ADAGIO: Interactive Experimentation with Adversarial Attack and Defense for Audiocited by 12
  9. 2018To Reverse the Gradient or Not: An Empirical Comparison of Adversarial and Multi-task Learning in Speech Recognitioncited by 10
  10. 2021Adversarial Joint Training with Self-Attention Mechanism for Robust End-to-End Speech Recognitioncited by 5
  11. 2021Perceptual-based deep-learning denoiser as a defense against adversarial attacks on ASR systemscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.