To Find Waldo You Need Contextual Cues: Debiasing Who's Waldo
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a debiased dataset for the Person-centric Visual Grounding (PCVG) task first proposed by Cui et al. (2021) in the Who's Waldo dataset. Given an image and a caption, PCVG requires pairing up a person's name mentioned in a caption with a bounding box that points to the person in the image. We find that the original Who's Waldo dataset compiled for this task contains a large number of biased samples that are solvable simply by heuristic methods; for instance, in many cases the first name in the sentence corresponds to the largest bounding box, or the sequence of names in the sentence corresponds to an exact left-to-right order in the image. Naturally, models trained on these biased data lead to over-estimation of performance on the benchmark. To enforce models being correct for the correct reasons, we design automated tools to filter and debias the original dataset by ruling out all examples of insufficient context, such as those with no verb or with a long chain of conjunct names in their captions. Our experiments show that our new sub-sampled dataset contains less bias with much lowered heuristic performances and widened gaps between heuristic and supervised methods. We also demonstrate the same benchmark model trained on our debiased training set outperforms that trained on the original biased (and larger) training set on our debiased test set. We argue our debiased dataset offers the PCVG task a more practical baseline for reliable benchmarking and future improvements.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2022.
Builds on
29 of 37 references.
References · 29
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
- 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
- 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,054
- 2015Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptionscited by 897
- 2018From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 553
- 2018MAttNet: Modular Attention Network for Referring Expression Comprehensioncited by 427
17 more
- 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 337
- 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 183
- 2019Distribution-Aware Coordinate Representation for Human Pose Estimationcited by 165
- 2020Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biasescited by 159
- 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
- 2020Counterfactual Samples Synthesizing for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 153
- 2015Grounding of Textual Phrases in Images by Reconstructioncited by 112
- 2020Contrastive Learning for Weakly Supervised Phrase Groundingcited by 102
- 2014Deep Fragment Embeddings for Bidirectional Image Sentence Mappingcited by 99
- 2020Referring Expression Comprehension: A Survey of Methods and Datasetscited by 78
- 2020Roses Are Red, Violets Are Blue... but Should Vqa Expect Them To?cited by 69
- 2020MUTANT: A Training Paradigm for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Visual Question Answeringcited by 63
- 2020Video2Commonsense: Generating Commonsense Descriptions to Enrich Video Captioningcited by 36
- 2018Evaluating Compositionality in Sentence Embeddingscited by 35
- 2020DQI: Measuring Data Quality in NLPcited by 23
- 2021Who's Waldo? Linking People Across Text and Imagescited by 16
- 2019Phrase Grounding by Soft-Label Chain Conditional Random Fieldcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.