mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DQI: Measuring Data Quality in NLP

arXiv 2005.00816 ↗First posted 2 May 2020cs.CLcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural language models have achieved human level performance across several NLP datasets. However, recent studies have shown that these models are not truly learning the desired task; rather, their high performance is attributed to overfitting using spurious biases, which suggests that the capabilities of AI systems have been over-estimated. We introduce a generic formula for Data Quality Index (DQI) to help dataset creators create datasets free of such unwanted biases. We evaluate this formula using a recently proposed approach for adversarial filtering, AFLite. We propose a new data creation paradigm using DQI to create higher quality data. The data creation paradigm consists of several data visualizations to help data creators (i) understand the quality of data and (ii) visualize the impact of the created data instance on the overall quality. It also has a couple of automation methods to (i) assist data creators and (ii) make the model more robust to adversarial attacks. We use DQI along with these automation methods to renovate biased examples in SNLI. We show that models trained on the renovated SNLI dataset generalize better to out of distribution tasks. Renovation results in reduced model performance, exposing a large gap with respect to human performance. DQI systematically helps in creating harder benchmarks using active learning. Our work takes the process of dynamic dataset creation forward, wherein datasets evolve together with the evolving state of the art, therefore serving as a means of benchmarking the true progress of AI.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 10; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 230
  2. 2022NumGLUE: A Suite of Fundamental yet Challenging Mathematical Reasoning Taskscited by 110
  3. 2022ProGen: Progressive Zero-shot Dataset Generation via In-context Feedbackcited by 67
  4. 2024Explaining Length Bias in LLM-Based Preference Evaluationscited by 48
  5. 2022Don't Blame the Annotator: Bias Already Starts in the Annotation Instructionscited by 47
  6. 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Modelscited by 29
  7. 2021How Robust are Model Rankings: A Leaderboard Customization Approach for Equitable Evaluationcited by 24
  8. 2022Rainproof: An Umbrella To Shield Text Generators From Out-Of-Distribution Datacited by 21
  9. 2022ILDAE: Instance-Level Difficulty Analysis of Evaluation Datacited by 17
  10. 2022How Many Data Samples is an Additional Instruction Worth?cited by 16
  11. 2024Don't Blame the Data, Blame the Model: Understanding Noise and Bias When Learning from Subjective Annotationscited by 10
  12. 2025Towards Better Instruction Following Retrieval Modelscited by 9
11 more
  1. 2022ShortcutLens: A Visual Analytics Approach for Exploring Shortcuts in Natural Language Understanding Datasetcited by 6
  2. 2025Measuring Diversity in Synthetic Datasetscited by 5
  3. 2022A Proposal to Study "Is High Quality Data All We Need?"cited by 2
  4. 2022To Find Waldo You Need Contextual Cues: Debiasing Who's Waldocited by 2
  5. 2022Pretrained Transformers Do not Always Improve Robustnesscited by 2
  6. 2026Neuron-Aware Data Selection In Instruction Tuning For Large Language Modelscited by 1
  7. 20241 Trillion Token (1TT) Platform: A Novel Framework for Efficient Data Sharing and Compensation in Large Language Modelscited by 0
  8. 2024Effects of Soft-Domain Transfer and Named Entity Information on Deception Detectioncited by 0
  9. 2025Autoencoder-Based Framework to Capture Vocabulary Quality in NLPcited by 0
  10. 2025HAMMER: Hamiltonian Curiosity Augmented Large Language Model Reinforcementcited by 0
  11. 2026Measuring Dataset Diversity from a Geometric Perspectivecited by 0