Lost in Translation? Translation Errors and Challenges for Fair Assessment of Text-to-Image Models on Multilingual Concepts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Benchmarks of the multilingual capabilities of text-to-image (T2I) models compare generated images prompted in a test language to an expected image distribution over a concept set. One such benchmark, "Conceptual Coverage Across Languages" (CoCo-CroLa), assesses the tangible noun inventory of T2I models by prompting them to generate pictures from a concept list translated to seven languages and comparing the output image populations. Unfortunately, we find that this benchmark contains translation errors of varying severity in Spanish, Japanese, and Chinese. We provide corrections for these errors and analyze how impactful they are on the utility and validity of CoCo-CroLa as a benchmark. We reassess multiple baseline T2I models with the revisions, compare the outputs elicited under the new translations to those conditioned on the old, and show that a correction's impactfulness on the image-domain benchmark results can be predicted in the text domain with similarity scores. Our findings will guide the future development of T2I multilinguality metrics by providing analytical tools for practical translation decisions.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2024.
Builds on
14 of 31 references.
References · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
- 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
- 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 117
- 2022AltCLIP: Altering the Language Encoder in CLIP for Extended Language Capabilitiescited by 85
- 2022WikiWhy: Answering and Explaining Cause-and-Effect Questionscited by 21
- 2016Multimodal Pivots for Image Caption Translationcited by 18
- 2021Who's Waldo? Linking People Across Text and Imagescited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024VBench++: Comprehensive and Versatile Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 45
- 2024Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrologycited by 35
- 2024Who Evaluates the Evaluations? Objectively Scoring Text-to-Image Prompt Coherence Metrics with T2IScoreScore (TS2)cited by 18
- 2024Losing Visual Needles in Image Haystacks: Vision Language Models are Easily Distracted in Short and Long Contextscited by 14
- 2025CAIRe: Cultural Attribution of Images by Retrieval-Augmented Evaluationcited by 1
- 2025CAIRe: Cultural Attribution of Images by Retrieval-Augmented Evaluation10 Jun 2025
- 2024VBench++: Comprehensive and Versatile Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Models20 Nov 2024
- 2024Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrology22 Jul 2024
- 2024Losing Visual Needles in Image Haystacks: Vision Language Models are Easily Distracted in Short and Long Contexts24 Jun 2024
- 2024Who Evaluates the Evaluations? Objectively Scoring Text-to-Image Prompt Coherence Metrics with T2IScoreScore (TS2)5 Apr 2024