mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Calibrating constitutive models with full-field data via physics informed neural networks

arXiv 2203.16577 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2022cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The calibration of solid constitutive models with full-field experimental data is a long-standing challenge, especially in materials which undergo large deformation. In this paper, we propose a physics-informed deep-learning framework for the discovery of constitutive model parameterizations given full-field displacement data and global force-displacement data. Contrary to the majority of recent literature in this field, we work with the weak form of the governing equations rather than the strong form to impose physical constraints upon the neural network predictions. The approach presented in this paper is computationally efficient, suitable for irregular geometric domains, and readily ingests displacement data without the need for interpolation onto a computational grid. A selection of canonical hyperelastic materials models suitable for different material classes is considered including the Neo-Hookean, Gent, and Blatz-Ko constitutive models as exemplars for general hyperelastic behavior, polymer behavior with lock-up, and compressible foam behavior respectively. We demonstrate that physics informed machine learning is an enabling technology and may shift the paradigm of how full-field experimental data is utilized to calibrate constitutive models under finite deformations.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2022.

Builds on

20 of 59 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  4. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  5. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 473
  6. 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 335
  7. 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
  8. 2021Exact imposition of boundary conditions with distance functions in physics-informed deep neural networkscited by 137
  9. 2020Understanding and mitigating gradient pathologies in physics-informed neural networkscited by 135
  10. 2020Physics informed deep learning for computational elastodynamics without labeled datacited by 80
  11. 2021Polyconvex anisotropic hyperelasticity with neural networkscited by 55
  12. 2020Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive lawscited by 51
8 more
  1. 2020Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonhomogeneous Material Identification in Elasticity Imagingcited by 40
  2. 2018Model-Free Data-Driven Inelasticitycited by 29
  3. 2021The mixed deep energy method for resolving concentration features in finite strain hyperelasticitycited by 28
  4. 2022Discovering plasticity models without stress datacited by 28
  5. 2020Meshless physics-informed deep learning method for three-dimensional solid mechanicscited by 27
  6. 2021Data vs. Physics: The Apparent Pareto Front of Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 27
  7. 2022Bayesian-EUCLID: discovering hyperelastic material laws with uncertaintiescited by 23
  8. 2020Data-driven fracture mechanicscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

12 papers.