mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deterministic and statistical calibration of constitutive models from full-field data with parametric physics-informed neural networks

arXiv 2405.18311 ↗First posted 28 May 2024cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The calibration of constitutive models from full-field data has recently gained increasing interest due to improvements in full-field measurement capabilities. In addition to the experimental characterization of novel materials, continuous structural health monitoring is another application that is of great interest. However, monitoring is usually associated with severe time constraints, difficult to meet with standard numerical approaches. Therefore, parametric physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for constitutive model calibration from full-field displacement data are investigated. In an offline stage, a parametric PINN can be trained to learn a parameterized solution of the underlying partial differential equation. In the subsequent online stage, the parametric PINN then acts as a surrogate for the parameters-to-state map in calibration. We test the proposed approach for the deterministic least-squares calibration of a linear elastic as well as a hyperelastic constitutive model from noisy synthetic displacement data. We further carry out Markov chain Monte Carlo-based Bayesian inference to quantify the uncertainty. A proper statistical evaluation of the results underlines the high accuracy of the deterministic calibration and that the estimated uncertainty is valid. Finally, we consider experimental data and show that the results are in good agreement with a finite element method-based calibration. Due to the fast evaluation of PINNs, calibration can be performed in near real-time. This advantage is particularly evident in many-query applications such as Markov chain Monte Carlo-based Bayesian inference.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2024.

Builds on

14 of 78 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
  4. 2017A unified deep artificial neural network approach to partial differential equations in complex geometriescited by 122
  5. 2020Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive lawscited by 51
  6. 2021Physics informed neural networks for continuum micromechanicscited by 46
  7. 2018Data-driven discovery of PDEs in complex datasetscited by 42
  8. 2020Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonhomogeneous Material Identification in Elasticity Imagingcited by 40
  9. 2020A Physics-Guided Neural Network Framework for Elastic Plates: Comparison of Governing Equations-Based and Energy-Based Approachescited by 34
  10. 2022Calibrating constitutive models with full-field data via physics informed neural networkscited by 12
  11. 2022Physics-informed neural networks for solving parametric magnetostatic problemscited by 10
  12. 2024Reduced and All-at-Once Approaches for Model Calibration and Discovery in Computational Solid Mechanicscited by 5
2 more
  1. 2022Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Material Model Calibration from Full-Field Displacement Datacited by 4
  2. 2024Parameter identification and uncertainty propagation of hydrogel coupled diffusion-deformation using POD-based reduced-order modelingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.