mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep reinforcement learning for optimal well control in subsurface systems with uncertain geology

arXiv 2203.13375 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2022physics.comp-ph cs.AI cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A general control policy framework based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is introduced for closed-loop decision making in subsurface flow settings. Traditional closed-loop modeling workflows in this context involve the repeated application of data assimilation/history matching and robust optimization steps. Data assimilation can be particularly challenging in cases where both the geological style (scenario) and individual model realizations are uncertain. The closed-loop reservoir management (CLRM) problem is formulated here as a partially observable Markov decision process, with the associated optimization problem solved using a proximal policy optimization algorithm. This provides a control policy that instantaneously maps flow data observed at wells (as are available in practice) to optimal well pressure settings. The policy is represented by a temporal convolution and gated transformer blocks. Training is performed in a preprocessing step with an ensemble of prior geological models, which can be drawn from multiple geological scenarios. Example cases involving the production of oil via water injection, with both 2D and 3D geological models, are presented. The DRL-based methodology is shown to result in an NPV increase of 15% (for the 2D cases) and 33% (3D cases) relative to robust optimization over prior models, and to an average improvement of 4% in NPV relative to traditional CLRM. The solutions from the control policy are found to be comparable to those from deterministic optimization, in which the geological model is assumed to be known, even when multiple geological scenarios are considered. The control policy approach results in a 76% decrease in computational cost relative to traditional CLRM with the algorithms and parameter settings considered in this work.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2022.

Builds on

15 of 57 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  5. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
  6. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  7. 2019Stabilizing Transformers for Reinforcement Learningcited by 262
  8. 2018Bayesian Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks for Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 199
  9. 2019A deep-learning-based surrogate model for data assimilation in dynamic subsurface flow problemscited by 59
  10. 2019Direct shape optimization through deep reinforcement learningcited by 28
  11. 2020Theory-guided Auto-Encoder for Surrogate Construction and Inverse Modelingcited by 12
  12. 2018A Deep-Learning-Based Geological Parameterization for History Matching Complex Modelscited by 7
3 more
  1. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning for Constrained Field Development Optimization in Subsurface Two-phase Flowcited by 5
  2. 2021Use of low-fidelity models with machine-learning error correction for well placement optimizationcited by 4
  3. 2022Convolutional-Recurrent Neural Network Proxy for Robust Optimization and Closed-Loop Reservoir Managementcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

9 papers.