A Deep-Learning-Based Geological Parameterization for History Matching Complex Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A new low-dimensional parameterization based on principal component analysis (PCA) and convolutional neural networks (CNN) is developed to represent complex geological models. The CNN-PCA method is inspired by recent developments in computer vision using deep learning. CNN-PCA can be viewed as a generalization of an existing optimization-based PCA (O-PCA) method. Both CNN-PCA and O-PCA entail post-processing a PCA model to better honor complex geological features. In CNN-PCA, rather than use a histogram-based regularization as in O-PCA, a new regularization involving a set of metrics for multipoint statistics is introduced. The metrics are based on summary statistics of the nonlinear filter responses of geological models to a pre-trained deep CNN. In addition, in the CNN-PCA formulation presented here, a convolutional neural network is trained as an explicit transform function that can post-process PCA models quickly. CNN-PCA is shown to provide both unconditional and conditional realizations that honor the geological features present in reference SGeMS geostatistical realizations for a binary channelized system. Flow statistics obtained through simulation of random CNN-PCA models closely match results for random SGeMS models for a demanding case in which O-PCA models lead to significant discrepancies. Results for history matching are also presented. In this assessment CNN-PCA is applied with derivative-free optimization, and a subspace randomized maximum likelihood method is used to provide multiple posterior models. Data assimilation and significant uncertainty reduction are achieved for existing wells, and physically reasonable predictions are also obtained for new wells. Finally, the CNN-PCA method is extended to a more complex non-stationary bimodal deltaic fan system, and is shown to provide high-quality realizations for this challenging example.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2021A Deep Learning-Accelerated Data Assimilation and Forecasting Workflow for Commercial-Scale Geologic Carbon Storagecited by 14
- 2021Bayesian multiscale deep generative model for the solution of high-dimensional inverse problemscited by 12
- 2022Deep reinforcement learning for optimal well control in subsurface systems with uncertain geologycited by 9
- 2021Deep Learning for Simultaneous Inference of Hydraulic and Transport Propertiescited by 3
- 2021Applications of physics-informed scientific machine learning in subsurface science: A surveycited by 2
- 2022Uncertainty quantification of two-phase flow in porous media via coupled-TgNN surrogate modelcited by 0
- 2025Conditional Deep Generative Models for Belief State Planningcited by 0
- 2025Conditional Deep Generative Models for Belief State Planning16 May 2025
- 2022Uncertainty quantification of two-phase flow in porous media via coupled-TgNN surrogate model28 May 2022
- 2022Deep reinforcement learning for optimal well control in subsurface systems with uncertain geology24 Mar 2022
- 2021Deep Learning for Simultaneous Inference of Hydraulic and Transport Properties24 Oct 2021
- 2021A Deep Learning-Accelerated Data Assimilation and Forecasting Workflow for Commercial-Scale Geologic Carbon Storage9 May 2021
- 2021Applications of physics-informed scientific machine learning in subsurface science: A survey10 Apr 2021
- 2021Bayesian multiscale deep generative model for the solution of high-dimensional inverse problems4 Feb 2021