mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Negative Inner-Loop Learning Rates Learn Universal Features

arXiv 2203.10185 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2022cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) consists of two optimization loops: the outer loop learns a meta-initialization of model parameters that is shared across tasks, and the inner loop task-specific adaptation step. A variant of MAML, Meta-SGD, uses the same two loop structure, but also learns the learning-rate for the adaptation step. Little attention has been paid to how the learned learning-rate of Meta-SGD affects feature reuse. In this paper, we study the effect that a learned learning-rate has on the per-task feature representations in Meta-SGD. The learned learning-rate of Meta-SGD often contains negative values. During the adaptation phase, these negative learning rates push features away from task-specific features and towards task-agnostic features. We performed several experiments on the Mini-Imagenet dataset. Two neural networks were trained, one with MAML, and one with Meta-SGD. The feature quality for both models was tested as follows: strip away the linear classification layer, pass labeled and unlabeled samples through this encoder, classify the unlabeled samples according to their nearest neighbor. This process was performed: 1) after training and using the meta-initialization parameters; 2) after adaptation, and validated on that task; and 3) after adaptation, and validated on a different task. The MAML trained model improved on the task it was adapted to, but had worse performance on other tasks. The Meta-SGD trained model was the opposite; it had worse performance on the task it was adapted to, but improved on other tasks. This confirms the hypothesis that Meta-SGD's negative learning rates cause the model to learn task-agnostic features rather than simply adapt to task specific features.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2022.

Builds on

9 of 12 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  2. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  3. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,255
  4. 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,018
  5. 2017Meta-SGD: Learning to Learn Quickly for Few-Shot Learningcited by 379
  6. 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
  7. 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
  8. 2020Unraveling Meta-Learning: Understanding Feature Representations for Few-Shot Taskscited by 47
  9. 2021Meta-learning with negative learning ratescited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.