CCoMAML: Efficient Cattle Identification Using Cooperative Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cattle identification is critical for efficient livestock farming management, currently reliant on radio-frequency identification (RFID) ear tags. However, RFID-based systems are prone to failure due to loss, damage, tampering, and vulnerability to external attacks. As a robust alternative, biometric identification using cattle muzzle patterns similar to human fingerprints has emerged as a promising solution. Deep learning techniques have demonstrated success in leveraging these unique patterns for accurate identification. But deep learning models face significant challenges, including limited data availability, disruptions during data collection, and dynamic herd compositions that require frequent model retraining. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a novel few-shot learning framework for real-time cattle identification using Cooperative Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (CCoMAML) with Multi-Head Attention Feature Fusion (MHAFF) as a feature extractor model. This model offers great model adaptability to new data through efficient learning from few data samples without retraining. The proposed approach has been rigorously evaluated against current state-of-the-art few-shot learning techniques applied in cattle identification. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate that our proposed CCoMAML with MHAFF has superior cattle identification performance with 98.46% and 97.91% F1 scores.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2025.
Builds on
33 of 105 references.
References · 33
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,255
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
- 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,143
- 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
- 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 950
- 2018Meta-Learning with Latent Embedding Optimizationcited by 476
21 more
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2017Meta-SGD: Learning to Learn Quickly for Few-Shot Learningcited by 379
- 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
- 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
- 2019Meta-Dataset: A Dataset of Datasets for Learning to Learn from Few Examplescited by 315
- 2018How to train your MAMLcited by 309
- 2018Probabilistic Model-Agnostic Meta-Learningcited by 256
- 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
- 2015Adding Gradient Noise Improves Learning for Very Deep Networkscited by 145
- 2023Advances and Challenges in Meta-Learning: A Technical Reviewcited by 65
- 2023A Closer Look at Few-shot Classification Againcited by 46
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of the Number of Shots in Few-Shot Learningcited by 39
- 2023Meta-learning approaches for few-shot learning: A survey of recent advancescited by 25
- 2021Comparing Transfer and Meta Learning Approaches on a Unified Few-Shot Classification Benchmarkcited by 16
- 2015Convolutional Neural Network-Based Image Representation for Visual Loop Closure Detectioncited by 12
- 2021Bridging Few-Shot Learning and Adaptation: New Challenges of Support-Query Shiftcited by 9
- 2022A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques for Cattle Identification: Datasets, Methods and Future Directionscited by 9
- 2022Automatic Cattle Identification using YOLOv5 and Mosaic Augmentation: A Comparative Analysiscited by 5
- 2023Cattle Identification Using Muzzle Images and Deep Learning Techniquescited by 2
- 2022Negative Inner-Loop Learning Rates Learn Universal Featurescited by 1
- 2024Cooperative Meta-Learning with Gradient Augmentationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.