mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Meta-learning with negative learning rates

arXiv 2102.00940 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2021cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models require a large amount of data to perform well. When data is scarce for a target task, we can transfer the knowledge gained by training on similar tasks to quickly learn the target. A successful approach is meta-learning, or "learning to learn" a distribution of tasks, where "learning" is represented by an outer loop, and "to learn" by an inner loop of gradient descent. However, a number of recent empirical studies argue that the inner loop is unnecessary and more simple models work equally well or even better. We study the performance of MAML as a function of the learning rate of the inner loop, where zero learning rate implies that there is no inner loop. Using random matrix theory and exact solutions of linear models, we calculate an algebraic expression for the test loss of MAML applied to mixed linear regression and nonlinear regression with overparameterized models. Surprisingly, while the optimal learning rate for adaptation is positive, we find that the optimal learning rate for training is always negative, a setting that has never been considered before. Therefore, not only does the performance increase by decreasing the learning rate to zero, as suggested by recent work, but it can be increased even further by decreasing the learning rate to negative values. These results help clarify under what circumstances meta-learning performs best.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2021.

Builds on

33 of 41 references.

References · 33

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  3. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  4. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  5. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  6. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
  7. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
  8. 2019A Closer Look at Few-shot Classificationcited by 679
  9. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
  10. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
  11. 2020Rethinking Few-Shot Image Classification: a Good Embedding Is All You Need?cited by 435
  12. 2013DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognitioncited by 422
21 more
  1. 2018Meta-learning with differentiable closed-form solverscited by 395
  2. 2017Meta-SGD: Learning to Learn Quickly for Few-Shot Learningcited by 377
  3. 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
  4. 2019Meta-Dataset: A Dataset of Datasets for Learning to Learn from Few Examplescited by 312
  5. 2019A Baseline for Few-Shot Image Classificationcited by 298
  6. 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
  7. 2020Few-Shot Learning via Learning the Representation, Provablycited by 213
  8. 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 202
  9. 2019Adaptive Gradient-Based Meta-Learning Methodscited by 183
  10. 2020Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural Networkscited by 182
  11. 2018Recasting Gradient-Based Meta-Learning as Hierarchical Bayescited by 180
  12. 2020Provable Meta-Learning of Linear Representationscited by 161
  13. 2017Meta-Learning and Universality: Deep Representations and Gradient Descent can Approximate any Learning Algorithmcited by 65
  14. 2020Unraveling Meta-Learning: Understanding Feature Representations for Few-Shot Taskscited by 47
  15. 2020Meta-learning for mixed linear regressioncited by 44
  16. 2019More Data Can Hurt for Linear Regression: Sample-wise Double Descentcited by 37
  17. 2020How Important is the Train-Validation Split in Meta-Learning?cited by 30
  18. 2020Theoretical Convergence of Multi-Step Model-Agnostic Meta-Learningcited by 28
  19. 2020On the Global Optimality of Model-Agnostic Meta-Learningcited by 21
  20. 2020A Sample Complexity Separation between Non-Convex and Convex Meta-Learningcited by 17
  21. 2020Modeling and Optimization Trade-off in Meta-learningcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.

11 papers.