Learning Representation for Bayesian Optimization with Collision-free Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian optimization has been challenged by datasets with large-scale, high-dimensional, and non-stationary characteristics, which are common in real-world scenarios. Recent works attempt to handle such input by applying neural networks ahead of the classical Gaussian process to learn a latent representation. We show that even with proper network design, such learned representation often leads to collision in the latent space: two points with significantly different observations collide in the learned latent space, leading to degraded optimization performance. To address this issue, we propose LOCo, an efficient deep Bayesian optimization framework which employs a novel regularizer to reduce the collision in the learned latent space and encourage the mapping from the latent space to the objective value to be Lipschitz continuous. LOCo takes in pairs of data points and penalizes those too close in the latent space compared to their target space distance. We provide a rigorous theoretical justification for LOCo by inspecting the regret of this dynamic-embedding-based Bayesian optimization algorithm, where the neural network is iteratively retrained with the regularizer. Our empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of LOCo on several synthetic and real-world benchmark Bayesian optimization tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2022.
Builds on
18 of 43 references.
References · 18
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2016Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of moleculescited by 762
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
- 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
- 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 440
- 2019Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 359
- 2015Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 284
- 2013Bayesian Optimization in a Billion Dimensions via Random Embeddingscited by 178
- 2020Sample-Efficient Optimization in the Latent Space of Deep Generative Models via Weighted Retrainingcited by 121
- 2020Re-Examining Linear Embeddings for High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimizationcited by 89
- 2021On Feature Collapse and Deep Kernel Learning for Single Forward Pass Uncertaintycited by 87
6 more
- 2021The Promises and Pitfalls of Deep Kernel Learningcited by 81
- 2018Stagewise Safe Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 79
- 2015Safe Controller Optimization for Quadrotors with Gaussian Processescited by 77
- 2018Adversarially Robust Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 61
- 2020Guided Variational Autoencoder for Disentanglement Learningcited by 57
- 2014A warped kernel improving robustness in Bayesian optimization via random embeddingscited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Learning Regions of Interest for Bayesian Optimization with Adaptive Level-Set Estimationcited by 8
- 2024No-Regret Learning of Nash Equilibrium for Black-Box Games via Gaussian Processescited by 3
- 2026Finding the Needle in a Haystack: Test-Time Analog Circuit Representation Adaptation for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Finding the Needle in a Haystack: Test-Time Analog Circuit Representation Adaptation for Bayesian Optimization13 Aug 2026
- 2024No-Regret Learning of Nash Equilibrium for Black-Box Games via Gaussian Processes14 May 2024
- 2023Learning Regions of Interest for Bayesian Optimization with Adaptive Level-Set Estimation25 Jul 2023