mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A hierarchical approach for assessing the vulnerability of tree-based classification models to membership inference attack

arXiv 2502.09396 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.CRcited by 2

On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models can inadvertently expose confidential properties of their training data, making them vulnerable to membership inference attacks (MIA). While numerous evaluation methods exist, many require computationally expensive processes, such as training multiple shadow models. This article presents two new complementary approaches for efficiently identifying vulnerable tree-based models: an ante-hoc analysis of hyperparameter choices and a post-hoc examination of trained model structure. While these new methods cannot certify whether a model is safe from MIA, they provide practitioners with a means to significantly reduce the number of models that need to undergo expensive MIA assessment through a hierarchical filtering approach. More specifically, it is shown that the rank order of disclosure risk for different hyperparameter combinations remains consistent across datasets, enabling the development of simple, human-interpretable rules for identifying relatively high-risk models before training. While this ante-hoc analysis cannot determine absolute safety since this also depends on the specific dataset, it allows the elimination of unnecessarily risky configurations during hyperparameter tuning. Additionally, computationally inexpensive structural metrics serve as indicators of MIA vulnerability, providing a second filtering stage to identify risky models after training but before conducting expensive attacks. Empirical results show that hyperparameter-based risk prediction rules can achieve high accuracy in predicting the most at risk combinations of hyperparameters across different tree-based model types, while requiring no model training. Moreover, target model accuracy is not seen to correlate with privacy risk, suggesting opportunities to optimise model configurations for both performance and privacy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 30 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2025.

Builds on

30 of 57 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Range Membership Inference Attacks9 Aug
  2. 2024OSLO: One-Shot Label-Only Membership Inference Attacks27 May
  3. 2023Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference Attacks6 Dec
  4. 2023Scalable Membership Inference Attacks via Quantile Regression7 Jul
  5. 2023Gaussian Membership Inference Privacy12 Jun
  6. 2023Students Parrot Their Teachers: Membership Inference on Model Distillation6 Mar
  7. 2022On the Discredibility of Membership Inference Attacks6 Dec
  8. 2022A Blessing of Dimensionality in Membership Inference through Regularization27 May
  9. 2022MIAShield: Defending Membership Inference Attacks via Preemptive Exclusion of Members2 Mar
  10. 2022Parameters or Privacy: A Provable Tradeoff Between Overparameterization and Membership Inference2 Feb
  11. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles7 Dec
  12. 2021Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models18 Nov
2 more
  1. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey14 Mar
  2. 2021On the (In)Feasibility of Attribute Inference Attacks on Machine Learning Models12 Mar

Other references · 16

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
  4. 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 371
  5. 2020Neural Architecture Search without Trainingcited by 241
  6. 2019MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examplescited by 183
  7. 2020A Survey of Privacy Attacks in Machine Learningcited by 143
  8. 2019Updates-Leak: Data Set Inference and Reconstruction Attacks in Online Learningcited by 117
  9. 2021How Powerful are Performance Predictors in Neural Architecture Search?cited by 88
  10. 2020Evaluating Efficient Performance Estimators of Neural Architecturescited by 54
  11. 2018Algorithms that Remember: Model Inversion Attacks and Data Protection Lawcited by 52
  12. 2021Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Timecited by 44
4 more
  1. 2022A Critical Review on the Use (and Misuse) of Differential Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 27
  2. 2022GRAIMATTER Green Paper: Recommendations for disclosure control of trained Machine Learning (ML) models from Trusted Research Environments (TREs)cited by 4
  3. 2022Safe machine learning model release from Trusted Research Environments: The SACRO-ML packagecited by 2
  4. 2022A multi-language toolkit for the semi-automated checking of research outputscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.