mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Relational Surrogate Loss Learning

arXiv 2202.13197 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluation metrics in machine learning are often hardly taken as loss functions, as they could be non-differentiable and non-decomposable, e.g., average precision and F1 score. This paper aims to address this problem by revisiting the surrogate loss learning, where a deep neural network is employed to approximate the evaluation metrics. Instead of pursuing an exact recovery of the evaluation metric through a deep neural network, we are reminded of the purpose of the existence of these evaluation metrics, which is to distinguish whether one model is better or worse than another. In this paper, we show that directly maintaining the relation of models between surrogate losses and metrics suffices, and propose a rank correlation-based optimization method to maximize this relation and learn surrogate losses. Compared to previous works, our method is much easier to optimize and enjoys significant efficiency and performance gains. Extensive experiments show that our method achieves improvements on various tasks including image classification and neural machine translation, and even outperforms state-of-the-art methods on human pose estimation and machine reading comprehension tasks. Code is available at: https://github.com/hunto/ReLoss.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2022.

Builds on

29 of 48 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  6. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  7. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  8. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  9. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  10. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimationcited by 1,339
  11. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  12. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
17 more
  1. 2018Simple Baselines for Human Pose Estimation and Trackingcited by 502
  2. 2017Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 457
  3. 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
  4. 2020Revisiting Pre-Trained Models for Chinese Natural Language Processingcited by 262
  5. 2020Fast Differentiable Sorting and Rankingcited by 196
  6. 2019Distribution-Aware Coordinate Representation for Human Pose Estimationcited by 165
  7. 2017Towards Accurate Multi-person Pose Estimation in the Wildcited by 131
  8. 2019Stochastic Optimization of Sorting Networks via Continuous Relaxationscited by 111
  9. 2017DuReader: a Chinese Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset from Real-world Applicationscited by 110
  10. 2020GreedyNAS: Towards Fast One-Shot NAS with Greedy Supernetcited by 69
  11. 2021Differentiable Sorting Networks for Scalable Sorting and Ranking Supervisioncited by 31
  12. 2021Locally Free Weight Sharing for Network Width Searchcited by 27
  13. 2019Learning Surrogate Lossescited by 21
  14. 2021Sequence-Level Training for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 18
  15. 2018Multi-Passage Machine Reading Comprehension with Cross-Passage Answer Verificationcited by 17
  16. 2020Learning Surrogates via Deep Embeddingcited by 11
  17. 2021MCR-Net: A Multi-Step Co-Interactive Relation Network for Unanswerable Questions on Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.

2 papers.