False Memory Formation in Continual Learners Through Imperceptible Backdoor Trigger
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this brief, we show that sequentially learning new information presented to a continual (incremental) learning model introduces new security risks: an intelligent adversary can introduce small amount of misinformation to the model during training to cause deliberate forgetting of a specific task or class at test time, thus creating "false memory" about that task. We demonstrate such an adversary's ability to assume control of the model by injecting "backdoor" attack samples to commonly used generative replay and regularization based continual learning approaches using continual learning benchmark variants of MNIST, as well as the more challenging SVHN and CIFAR 10 datasets. Perhaps most damaging, we show this vulnerability to be very acute and exceptionally effective: the backdoor pattern in our attack model can be imperceptible to human eye, can be provided at any point in time, can be added into the training data of even a single possibly unrelated task and can be achieved with as few as just 1% of total training dataset of a single task.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2022.
Builds on
18 of 35 references.
References · 18
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
- 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,152
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
- 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 895
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 610
- 2018Progress & Compress: A scalable framework for continual learningcited by 516
- 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
6 more
- 2019A continual learning survey: Defying forgetting in classification taskscited by 118
- 2018Generative replay with feedback connections as a general strategy for continual learningcited by 103
- 2018Generative Models from the perspective of Continual Learningcited by 69
- 2020Targeted Forgetting and False Memory Formation in Continual Learners through Adversarial Backdoor Attackscited by 14
- 2020Generative Feature Replay with Orthogonal Weight Modification for Continual Learningcited by 10
- 2021Adversarial Targeted Forgetting in Regularization and Generative Based Continual Learning Modelscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023Adversary Aware Continual Learningcited by 3
- 2023Out-of-distribution forgetting: vulnerability of continual learning to intra-class distribution shiftcited by 3
- 2023Backdoor Attacks Against Incremental Learners: An Empirical Evaluation Studycited by 1
- 2023PACOL: Poisoning Attacks Against Continual Learnerscited by 1
- 2024Attack On Prompt: Backdoor Attack in Prompt-Based Continual Learningcited by 1
- 2025Addressing The Devastating Effects Of Single-Task Data Poisoning In Exemplar-Free Continual Learningcited by 0
- 2025Addressing The Devastating Effects Of Single-Task Data Poisoning In Exemplar-Free Continual Learning5 Jul 2025
- 2024Attack On Prompt: Backdoor Attack in Prompt-Based Continual Learning28 Jun 2024
- 2023PACOL: Poisoning Attacks Against Continual Learners18 Nov 2023
- 2023Out-of-distribution forgetting: vulnerability of continual learning to intra-class distribution shift1 Jun 2023
- 2023Backdoor Attacks Against Incremental Learners: An Empirical Evaluation Study28 May 2023
- 2023Adversary Aware Continual Learning27 Apr 2023