mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Distributionally Robust Fair Principal Components via Geodesic Descents

arXiv 2202.03071 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2022cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Principal component analysis is a simple yet useful dimensionality reduction technique in modern machine learning pipelines. In consequential domains such as college admission, healthcare and credit approval, it is imperative to take into account emerging criteria such as the fairness and the robustness of the learned projection. In this paper, we propose a distributionally robust optimization problem for principal component analysis which internalizes a fairness criterion in the objective function. The learned projection thus balances the trade-off between the total reconstruction error and the reconstruction error gap between subgroups, taken in the min-max sense over all distributions in a moment-based ambiguity set. The resulting optimization problem over the Stiefel manifold can be efficiently solved by a Riemannian subgradient descent algorithm with a sub-linear convergence rate. Our experimental results on real-world datasets show the merits of our proposed method over state-of-the-art baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2022.

Builds on

30 of 55 references.

References · 30

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  4. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  6. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  7. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  8. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  9. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  10. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
  11. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  12. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
18 more
  1. 2015Data-driven Distributionally Robust Optimization Using the Wasserstein Metric: Performance Guarantees and Tractable Reformulationscited by 285
  2. 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
  3. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  4. 2019Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization: Theory and Applications in Machine Learningcited by 169
  5. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  6. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  7. 2016Variance-based regularization with convex objectivescited by 153
  8. 2018The Price of Fair PCA: One Extra Dimensioncited by 67
  9. 2020A Distributionally Robust Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 43
  10. 2021Statistical Analysis of Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Estimatorscited by 27
  11. 2020On Linear Optimization over Wasserstein Ballscited by 23
  12. 2021Testing Group Fairness via Optimal Transport Projectionscited by 23
  13. 2018Convex Formulations for Fair Principal Component Analysiscited by 20
  14. 2021Sequential Domain Adaptation by Synthesizing Distributionally Robust Expertscited by 14
  15. 2019Bridging Bayesian and Minimax Mean Square Error Estimation via Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 11
  16. 2021Mean-Covariance Robust Risk Measurementcited by 9
  17. 2019Calculating Optimistic Likelihoods Using (Geodesically) Convex Optimizationcited by 7
  18. 2020Fair Principal Component Analysis and Filter Designcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

9 papers.