mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Stabilizing Spiking Neuron Training

arXiv 2202.00282 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2022cs.NE cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Stability arguments are often used to prevent learning algorithms from having ever increasing activity and weights that hinder generalization. However, stability conditions can clash with the sparsity required to augment the energy efficiency of spiking neurons. Nonetheless it can also provide solutions. In fact, spiking Neuromorphic Computing uses binary activity to improve Artificial Intelligence energy efficiency. However, its non-smoothness requires approximate gradients, known as Surrogate Gradients (SG), to close the performance gap with Deep Learning. Several SG have been proposed in the literature, but it remains unclear how to determine the best SG for a given task and network. Thus, we aim at theoretically define the best SG, through stability arguments, to reduce the need for grid search. In fact, we show that more complex tasks and networks need more careful choice of SG, even if overall the derivative of the fast sigmoid tends to outperform the other, for a wide range of learning rates. We therefore design a stability based theoretical method to choose initialization and SG shape before training on the most common spiking neuron, the Leaky Integrate and Fire (LIF). Since our stability method suggests the use of high firing rates at initialization, which is non-standard in the neuromorphic literature, we show that high initial firing rates, combined with a sparsity encouraging loss term introduced gradually, can lead to better generalization, depending on the SG shape. Our stability based theoretical solution, finds a SG and initialization that experimentally result in improved accuracy. We show how it can be used to reduce the need of extensive grid-search of dampening, sharpness and tail-fatness of the SG. We also show that our stability concepts can be extended to be applicable on different LIF variants, such as DECOLLE and fluctuations-driven initializations.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2022.

Builds on

19 of 51 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  2. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  4. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  5. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 763
  6. 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 626
  7. 2020AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradientscited by 283
  8. 2018SLAYER: Spike Layer Error Reassignment in Timecited by 266
  9. 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 249
  10. 2017SuperSpike: Supervised learning in multi-layer spiking neural networkscited by 182
  11. 2018Long short-term memory and learning-to-learn in networks of spiking neuronscited by 181
  12. 2019The Heidelberg spiking datasets for the systematic evaluation of spiking neural networkscited by 137
7 more
  1. 2021Accurate and efficient time-domain classification with adaptive spiking recurrent neural networkscited by 115
  2. 2018How to Start Training: The Effect of Initialization and Architecturecited by 109
  3. 2016Convolutional Networks for Fast, Energy-Efficient Neuromorphic Computingcited by 70
  4. 2020Effective and Efficient Computation with Multiple-timescale Spiking Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 43
  5. 2018Benchmarking Keyword Spotting Efficiency on Neuromorphic Hardwarecited by 37
  6. 2019Beyond Folklore: A Scaling Calculus for the Design and Initialization of ReLU Networkscited by 4
  7. 2019On the Initialization of Long Short-Term Memory Networkscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.