A Seven-Layer Model for Standardising AI Fairness Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Problem statement: Standardisation of AI fairness rules and benchmarks is challenging because AI fairness and other ethical requirements depend on multiple factors such as context, use case, type of the AI system, and so on. In this paper, we elaborate that the AI system is prone to biases at every stage of its lifecycle, from inception to its usage, and that all stages require due attention for mitigating AI bias. We need a standardised approach to handle AI fairness at every stage. Gap analysis: While AI fairness is a hot research topic, a holistic strategy for AI fairness is generally missing. Most researchers focus only on a few facets of AI model-building. Peer review shows excessive focus on biases in the datasets, fairness metrics, and algorithmic bias. In the process, other aspects affecting AI fairness get ignored. The solution proposed: We propose a comprehensive approach in the form of a novel seven-layer model, inspired by the Open System Interconnection (OSI) model, to standardise AI fairness handling. Despite the differences in the various aspects, most AI systems have similar model-building stages. The proposed model splits the AI system lifecycle into seven abstraction layers, each corresponding to a well-defined AI model-building or usage stage. We also provide checklists for each layer and deliberate on potential sources of bias in each layer and their mitigation methodologies. This work will facilitate layer-wise standardisation of AI fairness rules and benchmarking parameters.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2022.
Builds on
14 of 48 references.
References · 14
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
- 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 192
- 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 152
- 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
- 2018Achieving Fairness through Adversarial Learning: an Application to Recidivism Predictioncited by 77
- 2017Learning Certifiably Optimal Rule Lists for Categorical Datacited by 50
- 2017Themis-ml: A Fairness-aware Machine Learning Interface for End-to-end Discrimination Discovery and Mitigationcited by 24
- 2021A Framework for Fairness: A Systematic Review of Existing Fair AI Solutionscited by 18
- 2018Evaluating Fairness Metrics in the Presence of Dataset Biascited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.