mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A federated architecture for sector-led AI governance: lessons from India

arXiv 2603.26865 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2026cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: India has adopted a vertical, sector-led AI governance strategy. While promoting innovation, such a light-touch approach risks policy fragmentation. This paper aims to propose a cohesive "whole-of-government" architecture to mitigate these risks and connect policy goals with a practical implementation plan. Design/methodology/approach: The paper applies an established five-layer conceptual framework to the Indian context. First, it constructs a national architecture for overall governance. Second, it uses a detailed case study on AI incident management to validate and demonstrate the architecture's practical utility in designing a specific, operational system. Findings: The paper develops two actionable architectures. The primary model assigns clear governance roles to India's key institutions. The second is a detailed, federated architecture for national AI Incident Management. It addresses the data silo problem by using a common national standard that allows sector-specific data collection while facilitating cross-sectoral analysis. Practical implications: The proposed architectures offer a clear and predictable roadmap for India's policymakers, regulators and industry to accelerate the national AI governance agenda. Social implications: By providing a systematic path from policy to practice, the architecture builds public trust. This structured approach ensures accountability and aligns AI development with societal values. Originality/value: This paper proposes a detailed operational architecture for India's "whole-of-government" approach to AI. It offers a globally relevant template for any nation pursuing a sector-led governance model, providing a clear implementation plan. Furthermore, the proposed federated architecture demonstrates how adopting common standards can enable cross-border data aggregation and global sectoral risk analysis without centralising control.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.

Builds on

7 of 37 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Databasecited by 95
  2. 2022Fairness Score and Process Standardization: Framework for Fairness Certification in Artificial Intelligence Systemscited by 14
  3. 2021AI and Ethics -- Operationalising Responsible AIcited by 11
  4. 2025Standardised schema and taxonomy for AI incident databases in critical digital infrastructurecited by 5
  5. 2025Advancing Trustworthy AI for Sustainable Development: Recommendations for Standardising AI Incident Reportingcited by 4
  6. 2025A five-layer framework for AI governance: integrating regulation, standards, and certificationcited by 2
  7. 2025Incorporating AI incident reporting into telecommunications law and policy: Insights from Indiacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.