Multi-winner Approval Voting Goes Epistemic
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Epistemic voting interprets votes as noisy signals about a ground truth. We consider contexts where the truth consists of a set of objective winners, knowing a lower and upper bound on its cardinality. A prototypical problem for this setting is the aggre-gation of multi-label annotations with prior knowledge on the size of the ground truth. We posit noisemodels, for which we define rules that output an optimal set of winners. We report on experiments on multi-label annotations (which we collected).
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2022.
Builds on
5 of 39 references.
References · 5
- 2015Approval Voting and Incentives in Crowdsourcingcited by 4
- 2020Evaluating approval-based multiwinner voting in terms of robustness to noisecited by 4
- 2021Surprisingly Popular Voting Recovers Rankings, Surprisingly!cited by 4
- 2020On Aggregation in Ensembles of Multilabel Classifierscited by 3
- 2021Truth-tracking via Approval Voting: Size Matterscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.