Approval Voting and Incentives in Crowdsourcing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The growing need for labeled training data has made crowdsourcing an important part of machine learning. The quality of crowdsourced labels is, however, adversely affected by three factors: (1) the workers are not experts; (2) the incentives of the workers are not aligned with those of the requesters; and (3) the interface does not allow workers to convey their knowledge accurately, by forcing them to make a single choice among a set of options. In this paper, we address these issues by introducing approval voting to utilize the expertise of workers who have partial knowledge of the true answer, and coupling it with a ("strictly proper") incentive-compatible compensation mechanism. We show rigorous theoretical guarantees of optimality of our mechanism together with a simple axiomatic characterization. We also conduct preliminary empirical studies on Amazon Mechanical Turk which validate our approach.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Data Pricing in Machine Learning Pipelinescited by 18
- 2022Multi-winner Approval Voting Goes Epistemiccited by 2
- 2021Truth-tracking via Approval Voting: Size Matterscited by 1
- 2021Incentivizing an Unknown Crowdcited by 0
- 2022Multi-winner Approval Voting Goes Epistemic17 Jan 2022
- 2021Truth-tracking via Approval Voting: Size Matters7 Dec 2021
- 2021Incentivizing an Unknown Crowd9 Sep 2021
- 2021Data Pricing in Machine Learning Pipelines18 Aug 2021