On Aggregation in Ensembles of Multilabel Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While a variety of ensemble methods for multilabel classification have been proposed in the literature, the question of how to aggregate the predictions of the individual members of the ensemble has received little attention so far. In this paper, we introduce a formal framework of ensemble multilabel classification, in which we distinguish two principal approaches: "predict then combine" (PTC), where the ensemble members first make loss minimizing predictions which are subsequently combined, and "combine then predict" (CTP), which first aggregates information such as marginal label probabilities from the individual ensemble members, and then derives a prediction from this aggregation. While both approaches generalize voting techniques commonly used for multilabel ensembles, they allow to explicitly take the target performance measure into account. Therefore, concrete instantiations of CTP and PTC can be tailored to concrete loss functions. Experimentally, we show that standard voting techniques are indeed outperformed by suitable instantiations of CTP and PTC, and provide some evidence that CTP performs well for decomposable loss functions, whereas PTC is the better choice for non-decomposable losses.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2.
3 papers.
- 2022Deep learning for understanding multilabel imbalanced Chest X-ray datasetscited by 3
- 2021Tree-Based Dynamic Classifier Chainscited by 2
- 2022Multi-winner Approval Voting Goes Epistemiccited by 2
- 2022Deep learning for understanding multilabel imbalanced Chest X-ray datasets28 Jul 2022
- 2022Multi-winner Approval Voting Goes Epistemic17 Jan 2022
- 2021Tree-Based Dynamic Classifier Chains13 Dec 2021