mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Visual Identification of Problematic Bias in Large Label Spaces

arXiv 2201.06386 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2022cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While the need for well-trained, fair ML systems is increasing ever more, measuring fairness for modern models and datasets is becoming increasingly difficult as they grow at an unprecedented pace. One key challenge in scaling common fairness metrics to such models and datasets is the requirement of exhaustive ground truth labeling, which cannot always be done. Indeed, this often rules out the application of traditional analysis metrics and systems. At the same time, ML-fairness assessments cannot be made algorithmically, as fairness is a highly subjective matter. Thus, domain experts need to be able to extract and reason about bias throughout models and datasets to make informed decisions. While visual analysis tools are of great help when investigating potential bias in DL models, none of the existing approaches have been designed for the specific tasks and challenges that arise in large label spaces. Addressing the lack of visualization work in this area, we propose guidelines for designing visualizations for such large label spaces, considering both technical and ethical issues. Our proposed visualization approach can be integrated into classical model and data pipelines, and we provide an implementation of our techniques open-sourced as a TensorBoard plug-in. With our approach, different models and datasets for large label spaces can be systematically and visually analyzed and compared to make informed fairness assessments tackling problematic bias.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2022.

Builds on

20 of 62 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  4. 2018The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scalecited by 544
  5. 2018Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Modelscited by 236
  6. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  7. 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
  8. 2019Predictive Inequity in Object Detectioncited by 77
  9. 2019FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Makingcited by 59
  10. 2020A Survey of Visual Analytics Techniques for Machine Learningcited by 56
  11. 2020DECE: Decision Explorer with Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 38
  12. 2020Boxer: Interactive Comparison of Classifier Resultscited by 28
8 more
  1. 2017Themis-ml: A Fairness-aware Machine Learning Interface for End-to-end Discrimination Discovery and Mitigationcited by 24
  2. 2021Measuring Model Biases in the Absence of Ground Truthcited by 24
  3. 2020Visual Analysis of Discrimination in Machine Learningcited by 15
  4. 2020Joint Optimization of AI Fairness and Utility: A Human-Centered Approachcited by 10
  5. 2020Designing Tools for Semi-Automated Detection of Machine Learning Biases: An Interview Studycited by 4
  6. 2019A Comparison of Radial and Linear Charts for Visualizing Daily Patterncited by 2
  7. 2020The Impact of Presentation Style on Human-In-The-Loop Detection of Algorithmic Biascited by 2
  8. 2020Comparative Layouts Revisited: Design Space, Guidelines, and Future Directionscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.