A Comparison of Radial and Linear Charts for Visualizing Daily Pattern
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Radial charts are generally considered less effective than linear charts. Perhaps the only exception is in visualizing periodical time-dependent data, which is believed to be naturally supported by the radial layout. It has been demonstrated that the drawbacks of radial charts outweigh the benefits of this natural mapping. Visualization of daily patterns, as a special case, has not been systematically evaluated using radial charts. In contrast to yearly or weekly recurrent trends, the analysis of daily patterns on a radial chart may benefit from our trained skill on reading radial clocks that are ubiquitous in our culture. In a crowd-sourced experiment with 92 non-expert users, we evaluated the accuracy, efficiency, and subjective ratings of radial and linear charts for visualizing daily traffic accident patterns. We systematically compared juxtaposed 12-hours variants and single 24-hours variants for both layouts in four low-level tasks and one high-level interpretation task. Our results show that over all tasks, the most elementary 24-hours linear bar chart is most accurate and efficient and is also preferred by the users. This provides strong evidence for the use of linear layouts - even for visualizing periodical daily patterns.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
2 papers.
- 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 203
- 2022Visual Identification of Problematic Bias in Large Label Spacescited by 0
- 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Survey17 Mar 2023
- 2022Visual Identification of Problematic Bias in Large Label Spaces17 Jan 2022