Bias In, Bias Out? Finding Unbiased Subnetworks in Vanilla Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The issue of algorithmic biases in deep learning has led to the development of various debiasing techniques, many of which perform complex training procedures or dataset manipulation. However, an intriguing question arises: is it possible to extract fair and bias-agnostic subnetworks from standard vanilla-trained models without relying on additional data, such as unbiased training set? In this work, we introduce Bias-Invariant Subnetwork Extraction (BISE), a learning strategy that identifies and isolates "bias-free" subnetworks that already exist within conventionally trained models, without retraining or finetuning the original parameters. Our approach demonstrates that such subnetworks can be extracted via pruning and can operate without modification, effectively relying less on biased features and maintaining robust performance. Our findings contribute towards efficient bias mitigation through structural adaptation of pre-trained neural networks via parameter removal, as opposed to costly strategies that are either data-centric or involve (re)training all model parameters. Extensive experiments on common benchmarks show the advantages of our approach in terms of the performance and computational efficiency of the resulting debiased model.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 89 of its 110 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.
Builds on
89 of 110 references.
References · 89
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,031
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
38 more
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 776
- 2016Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 538
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 475
- 2020Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuningcited by 398
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
- 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
- 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
- 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
- 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
- 2018Learning Deep Representations with Probabilistic Knowledge Transfercited by 209
- 2019Deconstructing Lottery Tickets: Zeros, Signs, and the Supermaskcited by 206
- 2019Structured Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 201
- 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 200
- 2019Learning De-biased Representations with Biased Representationscited by 199
- 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 183
- 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 177
- 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 171
- 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 164
- 2020Characterising Bias in Compressed Modelscited by 162
- 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
- 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
- 2022Knowledge Distillation with the Reused Teacher Classifiercited by 140
- 2019Learning Robust Representations by Projecting Superficial Statistics Outcited by 123
- 2023Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A surveycited by 122
- 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
- 2021EnD: Entangling and Disentangling deep representations for bias correctioncited by 105
- 2017MorphNet: Fast & Simple Resource-Constrained Structure Learning of Deep Networkscited by 92
- 2020Masking as an Efficient Alternative to Finetuning for Pretrained Language Modelscited by 92
- 2021Lost in Pruning: The Effects of Pruning Neural Networks beyond Test Accuracycited by 62
- 2021A Winning Hand: Compressing Deep Networks Can Improve Out-Of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 62
- 2022FairPrune: Achieving Fairness Through Pruning for Dermatological Disease Diagnosiscited by 59
- 2019Conscientious Classification: A Data Scientist's Guide to Discrimination-Aware Classificationcited by 55
- 2022Learning Debiased Classifier with Biased Committeecited by 51
- 2022Discover and Mitigate Unknown Biases with Debiasing Alternate Networkscited by 47
50 most cited of 89 All 89 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.