mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Feature Extraction from Histopathological Images Through A Fine-tuning ImageNet Model

arXiv 2201.00636 ↗First posted 3 Jan 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to lack of annotated pathological images, transfer learning has been the predominant approach in the field of digital pathology.Pre-trained neural networks based on ImageNet database are often used to extract "off the shelf" features, achieving great success in predicting tissue types, molecular features, and clinical outcomes, etc. We hypothesize that fine-tuning the pre-trained models using histopathological images could further improve feature extraction, and downstream prediction performance.We used 100,000 annotated HE image patches for colorectal cancer (CRC) to finetune a pretrained Xception model via a twostep approach.The features extracted from finetuned Xception (FTX2048) model and Imagepretrained (IMGNET2048) model were compared through: (1) tissue classification for HE images from CRC, same image type that was used for finetuning; (2) prediction of immunerelated gene expression and (3) gene mutations for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).Fivefold cross validation was used for model performance evaluation. The extracted features from the finetuned FTX2048 exhibited significantly higher accuracy for predicting tisue types of CRC compared to the off the shelf feature directly from Xception based on ImageNet database. Particularly, FTX2048 markedly improved the accuracy for stroma from 87% to 94%. Similarly, features from FTX2048 boosted the prediction of transcriptomic expression of immunerelated genesin LUAD. For the genes that had signigicant relationships with image fetures, the features fgrom the finetuned model imprroved the prediction for the majority of the genes. Inaddition, fetures from FTX2048 improved prediction of mutation for 5 out of 9 most frequently mutated genes in LUAD.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2022.

Builds on

14 of 43 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  5. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  6. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  7. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  8. 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,097
  9. 2020Whole Slide Images based Cancer Survival Prediction using Attention Guided Deep Multiple Instance Learning Networkscited by 178
  10. 2016Deep Learning for Identifying Metastatic Breast Cancercited by 93
  11. 2021Fine-Tuning and Training of DenseNet for Histopathology Image Representation Using TCGA Diagnostic Slidescited by 52
  12. 2020Self-Supervision Closes the Gap Between Weak and Strong Supervision in Histologycited by 43
2 more
  1. 2019Improving Prostate Cancer Detection with Breast Histopathology Imagescited by 4
  2. 2020How Much Off-The-Shelf Knowledge Is Transferable From Natural Images To Pathology Images?cited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

8 papers.