Pediatric brain tumor classification using digital histopathology and deep learning: evaluation of SOTA methods on a multi-center Swedish cohort
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children and young adults, but the scarcity of large histopathology datasets has limited the application of computational pathology in this group. This study implements two weakly supervised multiple-instance learning (MIL) approaches on patch-features obtained from state-of-the-art histology-specific foundation models to classify pediatric brain tumors in hematoxylin and eosin whole slide images (WSIs) from a multi-center Swedish cohort. WSIs from 540 subjects (age 8.5±4.9 years) diagnosed with brain tumor were gathered from the six Swedish university hospitals. Instance (patch)-level features were obtained from WSIs using three pre-trained feature extractors: ResNet50, UNI, and CONCH. Instances were aggregated using attention-based MIL (ABMIL) or clustering-constrained attention MIL (CLAM) for patient-level classification. Models were evaluated on three classification tasks based on the hierarchical classification of pediatric brain tumors: tumor category, family, and type. Model generalization was assessed by training on data from two of the centers and testing on data from four other centers. Model interpretability was evaluated through attention mapping. The highest classification performance was achieved using UNI features and ABMIL aggregation, with Matthew's correlation coefficient of 0.76±0.04, 0.63±0.04, and 0.60±0.05 for tumor category, family, and type classification, respectively. When evaluating generalization, models utilizing UNI and CONCH features outperformed those using ResNet50. However, the drop in performance from the in-site to out-of-site testing was similar across feature extractors. These results show the potential of state-of-the-art computational pathology methods in diagnosing pediatric brain tumors at different hierarchical levels with fair generalizability on a multi-center national dataset.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2024.
Builds on
11 of 47 references.
References · 11
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,077
- 2020Data Efficient and Weakly Supervised Computational Pathology on Whole Slide Imagescited by 738
- 2022Scaling Vision Transformers to Gigapixel Images via Hierarchical Self-Supervised Learningcited by 357
- 2022Multiple Instance Learning for Digital Pathology: A Review on the State-of-the-Art, Limitations & Future Potentialcited by 54
- 2023Domain Generalization in Computational Pathology: Survey and Guidelinescited by 29
- 2022Gigapixel Whole-Slide Images Classification using Locally Supervised Learningcited by 15
- 2024Benchmarking Embedding Aggregation Methods in Computational Pathology: A Clinical Data Perspectivecited by 10
- 2022Improving Feature Extraction from Histopathological Images Through A Fine-tuning ImageNet Modelcited by 8
- 2021Medulloblastoma Tumor Classification using Deep Transfer Learning with Multi-Scale EfficientNetscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.