Time to Embrace Natural Language Processing (NLP)-based Digital Pathology: Benchmarking NLP- and Convolutional Neural Network-based Deep Learning Pipelines
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
NLP-based computer vision models, particularly vision transformers, have been shown to outperform CNN models in many imaging tasks. However, most digital pathology artificial-intelligence models are based on CNN architectures, probably owing to a lack of data regarding NLP models for pathology images. In this study, we developed digital pathology pipelines to benchmark the five most recently proposed NLP models (vision transformer (ViT), Swin Transformer, MobileViT, CMT, and Sequencer2D) and four popular CNN models (ResNet18, ResNet50, MobileNetV2, and EfficientNet) to predict biomarkers in colorectal cancer (microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, and BRAF mutation). Hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images from Molecular and Cellular Oncology and The Cancer Genome Atlas were used as training and external validation datasets, respectively. Cross-study external validations revealed that the NLP-based models significantly outperformed the CNN-based models in biomarker prediction tasks, improving the overall prediction and precision up to approximately 10% and 26%, respectively. Notably, compared with existing models in the current literature using large training datasets, our NLP models achieved state-of-the-art predictions for all three biomarkers using a relatively small training dataset, suggesting that large training datasets are not a prerequisite for NLP models or transformers, and NLP may be more suitable for clinical studies in which small training datasets are commonly collected. The superior performance of Sequencer2D suggests that further research and innovation on both transformer and bidirectional long short-term memory architectures are warranted in the field of digital pathology. NLP models can replace classic CNN architectures and become the new workhorse backbone in the field of digital pathology.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2023.
Builds on
17 of 43 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,077
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
- 2021MobileViT: Light-weight, General-purpose, and Mobile-friendly Vision Transformercited by 636
- 2021CMT: Convolutional Neural Networks Meet Vision Transformerscited by 310
- 2019Automated Gleason Grading of Prostate Biopsies using Deep Learningcited by 69
- 2019Context-Aware Convolutional Neural Network for Grading of Colorectal Cancer Histology Imagescited by 39
- 2021Exploring Transformers in Natural Language Generation: GPT, BERT, and XLNetcited by 27
5 more
- 2022Sequencer: Deep LSTM for Image Classificationcited by 23
- 2020Detection of prostate cancer in whole-slide images through end-to-end training with image-level labelscited by 19
- 2022Improving Feature Extraction from Histopathological Images Through A Fine-tuning ImageNet Modelcited by 8
- 2022Predicting microsatellite instability and key biomarkers in colorectal cancer from H&E-stained images: Achieving SOTA predictive performance with fewer data using Swin Transformercited by 6
- 2022Colorectal cancer survival prediction using deep distribution based multiple-instance learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.