mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Saliency Grafting: Innocuous Attribution-Guided Mixup with Calibrated Label Mixing

arXiv 2112.08796 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2021cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Mixup scheme suggests mixing a pair of samples to create an augmented training sample and has gained considerable attention recently for improving the generalizability of neural networks. A straightforward and widely used extension of Mixup is to combine with regional dropout-like methods: removing random patches from a sample and replacing it with the features from another sample. Albeit their simplicity and effectiveness, these methods are prone to create harmful samples due to their randomness. To address this issue, 'maximum saliency' strategies were recently proposed: they select only the most informative features to prevent such a phenomenon. However, they now suffer from lack of sample diversification as they always deterministically select regions with maximum saliency, injecting bias into the augmented data. In this paper, we present, a novel, yet simple Mixup-variant that captures the best of both worlds. Our idea is two-fold. By stochastically sampling the features and 'grafting' them onto another sample, our method effectively generates diverse yet meaningful samples. Its second ingredient is to produce the label of the grafted sample by mixing the labels in a saliency-calibrated fashion, which rectifies supervision misguidance introduced by the random sampling procedure. Our experiments under CIFAR, Tiny-ImageNet, and ImageNet datasets show that our scheme outperforms the current state-of-the-art augmentation strategies not only in terms of classification accuracy, but is also superior in coping under stress conditions such as data corruption and object occlusion.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2021.

Builds on

34 of 49 references.

References · 34

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  7. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  8. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  9. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  10. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  11. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  12. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
22 more
  1. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  2. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  4. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  5. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  6. 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,059
  7. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  8. 2018Speech Commands: A Dataset for Limited-Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 741
  9. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  10. 2015Listen, Attend and Spellcited by 542
  11. 2015Deep Speech 2: End-to-End Speech Recognition in English and Mandarincited by 449
  12. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
  13. 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 342
  14. 2018DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networkscited by 261
  15. 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 260
  16. 2017Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noisecited by 164
  17. 2016Deep Pyramidal Residual Networkscited by 163
  18. 2018MixUp as Locally Linear Out-Of-Manifold Regularizationcited by 158
  19. 2020SaliencyMix: A Saliency Guided Data Augmentation Strategy for Better Regularizationcited by 149
  20. 2015Visualizing Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Using Natural Pre-Imagescited by 93
  21. 2019Relative Attributing Propagation: Interpreting the Comparative Contributions of Individual Units in Deep Neural Networkscited by 49
  22. 2018ShakeDrop Regularization for Deep Residual Learningcited by 40

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 8; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort: