mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Selective Volume Mixup for Video Action Recognition

arXiv 2309.09534 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2023cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recent advances in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers have convincingly demonstrated high learning capability for video action recognition on large datasets. Nevertheless, deep models often suffer from the overfitting effect on small-scale datasets with a limited number of training videos. A common solution is to exploit the existing image augmentation strategies for each frame individually including Mixup, Cutmix, and RandAugment, which are not particularly optimized for video data. In this paper, we propose a novel video augmentation strategy named Selective Volume Mixup (SV-Mix) to improve the generalization ability of deep models with limited training videos. SV-Mix devises a learnable selective module to choose the most informative volumes from two videos and mixes the volumes up to achieve a new training video. Technically, we propose two new modules, i.e., a spatial selective module to select the local patches for each spatial position, and a temporal selective module to mix the entire frames for each timestamp and maintain the spatial pattern. At each time, we randomly choose one of the two modules to expand the diversity of training samples. The selective modules are jointly optimized with the video action recognition framework to find the optimal augmentation strategy. We empirically demonstrate the merits of the SV-Mix augmentation on a wide range of video action recognition benchmarks and consistently boot the performances of both CNN-based and transformer-based models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2023.

Builds on

66 of 88 references.

References · 66

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  6. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  7. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  8. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  9. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  10. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,293
  11. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  12. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
38 more
  1. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  2. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
  3. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,620
  4. 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,620
  5. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,239
  6. 2021Grounded Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 1,156
  7. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,143
  8. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,103
  9. 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,091
  10. 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,068
  11. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 979
  12. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 902
  13. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  14. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 897
  15. 2018TSM: Temporal Shift Module for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 856
  16. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 730
  17. 2020X3D: Expanding Architectures for Efficient Video Recognitioncited by 637
  18. 2017Rethinking Spatiotemporal Feature Learning: Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs in Video Classificationcited by 521
  19. 2021MViTv2: Improved Multiscale Vision Transformers for Classification and Detectioncited by 519
  20. 2017Learning Spatio-Temporal Representation with Pseudo-3D Residual Networkscited by 387
  21. 2016Convolutional Two-Stream Network Fusion for Video Action Recognitioncited by 384
  22. 2019What Makes Training Multi-Modal Classification Networks Hard?cited by 344
  23. 2019Video Classification with Channel-Separated Convolutional Networkscited by 290
  24. 2021Keeping Your Eye on the Ball: Trajectory Attention in Video Transformerscited by 224
  25. 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
  26. 2022UniFormer: Unified Transformer for Efficient Spatiotemporal Representation Learningcited by 184
  27. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 175
  28. 2022Multiview Transformers for Video Recognitioncited by 148
  29. 2018Timeception for Complex Action Recognitioncited by 89
  30. 2016Long-term Temporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 84
  31. 2020On Mixup Regularizationcited by 83
  32. 2021TransMix: Attend to Mix for Vision Transformerscited by 79
  33. 2021AutoMix: Unveiling the Power of Mixup for Stronger Classifierscited by 69
  34. 2022SVFormer: Semi-supervised Video Transformer for Action Recognitioncited by 68
  35. 2021On Linear Stability of SGD and Input-Smoothness of Neural Networkscited by 63
  36. 2019Learning Spatio-Temporal Representation with Local and Global Diffusioncited by 61
  37. 2022MixGen: A New Multi-Modal Data Augmentationcited by 61
  38. 2020VideoMix: Rethinking Data Augmentation for Video Classificationcited by 55

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.