An Informative Tracking Benchmark
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Along with the rapid progress of visual tracking, existing benchmarks become less informative due to redundancy of samples and weak discrimination between current trackers, making evaluations on all datasets extremely time-consuming. Thus, a small and informative benchmark, which covers all typical challenging scenarios to facilitate assessing the tracker performance, is of great interest. In this work, we develop a principled way to construct a small and informative tracking benchmark (ITB) with 7% out of 1.2 M frames of existing and newly collected datasets, which enables efficient evaluation while ensuring effectiveness. Specifically, we first design a quality assessment mechanism to select the most informative sequences from existing benchmarks taking into account 1) challenging level, 2) discriminative strength, 3) and density of appearance variations. Furthermore, we collect additional sequences to ensure the diversity and balance of tracking scenarios, leading to a total of 20 sequences for each scenario. By analyzing the results of 15 state-of-the-art trackers re-trained on the same data, we determine the effective methods for robust tracking under each scenario and demonstrate new challenges for future research direction in this field.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2021.
Builds on
31 of 42 references.
References · 31
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2016Fully-Convolutional Siamese Networks for Object Trackingcited by 568
- 2018GOT-10k: A Large High-Diversity Benchmark for Generic Object Tracking in the Wildcited by 475
- 2018SiamRPN++: Evolution of Siamese Visual Tracking with Very Deep Networkscited by 446
- 2018LaSOT: A High-quality Benchmark for Large-scale Single Object Trackingcited by 429
- 2021Transformer Trackingcited by 412
- 2021Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Trackingcited by 350
- 2019Learning Discriminative Model Prediction for Trackingcited by 344
19 more
- 2018TrackingNet: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Object Tracking in the Wildcited by 343
- 2018ATOM: Accurate Tracking by Overlap Maximizationcited by 285
- 2016ECO: Efficient Convolution Operators for Trackingcited by 239
- 2020Probabilistic Regression for Visual Trackingcited by 231
- 2021Transformer Meets Tracker: Exploiting Temporal Context for Robust Visual Trackingcited by 220
- 2020Ocean: Object-aware Anchor-free Trackingcited by 212
- 2020Siamese Box Adaptive Network for Visual Trackingcited by 189
- 2018Distractor-aware Siamese Networks for Visual Object Trackingcited by 187
- 2018Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 176
- 2019Siam R-CNN: Visual Tracking by Re-Detectioncited by 174
- 2017Need for Speed: A Benchmark for Higher Frame Rate Object Trackingcited by 137
- 2020Know Your Surroundings: Exploiting Scene Information for Object Trackingcited by 119
- 2020High-Performance Long-Term Tracking with Meta-Updatercited by 80
- 2020Graph Attention Trackingcited by 70
- 2018Siamese Cascaded Region Proposal Networks for Real-Time Visual Trackingcited by 65
- 2019Target-Aware Deep Trackingcited by 43
- 2018Meta-Tracker: Fast and Robust Online Adaptation for Visual Object Trackerscited by 34
- 2020Unsupervised Deep Representation Learning for Real-Time Trackingcited by 29
- 2021Learning to Track Objects from Unlabeled Videoscited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3.
5 papers.
- 2022Joint Feature Learning and Relation Modeling for Tracking: A One-Stream Frameworkcited by 330
- 2023DropMAE: Learning Representations via Masked Autoencoders with Spatial-Attention Dropout for Temporal Matching Taskscited by 22
- 2024Correlation-Embedded Transformer Tracking: A Single-Branch Frameworkcited by 9
- 2024Improving Accuracy and Generalization for Efficient Visual Trackingcited by 3
- 2024Depth Attention for Robust RGB Trackingcited by 0
- 2024Improving Accuracy and Generalization for Efficient Visual Tracking28 Nov 2024
- 2024Depth Attention for Robust RGB Tracking27 Oct 2024
- 2024Correlation-Embedded Transformer Tracking: A Single-Branch Framework23 Jan 2024
- 2023DropMAE: Learning Representations via Masked Autoencoders with Spatial-Attention Dropout for Temporal Matching Tasks2 Apr 2023
- 2022Joint Feature Learning and Relation Modeling for Tracking: A One-Stream Framework22 Mar 2022