mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpolated Joint Space Adversarial Training for Robust and Generalizable Defenses

arXiv 2112.06323 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2021cs.CV cs.CRcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial training (AT) is considered to be one of the most reliable defenses against adversarial attacks. However, models trained with AT sacrifice standard accuracy and do not generalize well to novel attacks. Recent works show generalization improvement with adversarial samples under novel threat models such as on-manifold threat model or neural perceptual threat model. However, the former requires exact manifold information while the latter requires algorithm relaxation. Motivated by these considerations, we exploit the underlying manifold information with Normalizing Flow, ensuring that exact manifold assumption holds. Moreover, we propose a novel threat model called Joint Space Threat Model (JSTM), which can serve as a special case of the neural perceptual threat model that does not require additional relaxation to craft the corresponding adversarial attacks. Under JSTM, we develop novel adversarial attacks and defenses. The mixup strategy improves the standard accuracy of neural networks but sacrifices robustness when combined with AT. To tackle this issue, we propose the Robust Mixup strategy in which we maximize the adversity of the interpolated images and gain robustness and prevent overfitting. Our experiments show that Interpolated Joint Space Adversarial Training (IJSAT) achieves good performance in standard accuracy, robustness, and generalization in CIFAR-10/100, OM-ImageNet, and CIFAR-10-C datasets. IJSAT is also flexible and can be used as a data augmentation method to improve standard accuracy and combine with many existing AT approaches to improve robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2021.

Builds on

52 of 68 references.

References · 52

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  8. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
  9. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  10. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  11. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  12. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,636
38 more
  1. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
  2. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  3. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  4. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  5. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  6. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  7. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,058
  8. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  9. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  10. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  11. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
  12. 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 365
  13. 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
  14. 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 286
  15. 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 212
  16. 2018Semidefinite relaxations for certifying robustness to adversarial examplescited by 179
  17. 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 172
  18. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 149
  19. 2020Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat Modelscited by 137
  20. 2018Constructing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples with Generative Modelscited by 135
  21. 2018Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNISTcited by 104
  22. 2020Certified Defenses for Adversarial Patchescited by 101
  23. 2019Adversarial Robustness Against the Union of Multiple Perturbation Modelscited by 88
  24. 2019Functional Adversarial Attackscited by 82
  25. 2018Adversarial vulnerability for any classifiercited by 78
  26. 2019The Odds are Odd: A Statistical Test for Detecting Adversarial Examplescited by 75
  27. 2020Adversarial Vertex Mixup: Toward Better Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 73
  28. 2021On the effectiveness of adversarial training against common corruptionscited by 71
  29. 2021Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch Detectioncited by 67
  30. 2019Robustness Certificates for Sparse Adversarial Attacks by Randomized Ablationcited by 60
  31. 2019Mixup Inference: Better Exploiting Mixup to Defend Adversarial Attackscited by 54
  32. 2019Interpolated Adversarial Training: Achieving Robust Neural Networks without Sacrificing Too Much Accuracycited by 49
  33. 2020Dual Manifold Adversarial Robustness: Defense against Lp and non-Lp Adversarial Attackscited by 45
  34. 2017The Robust Manifold Defense: Adversarial Training using Generative Modelscited by 35
  35. 2020Random Smoothing Might be Unable to Certify ℓ_∞ Robustness for High-Dimensional Imagescited by 35
  36. 2018Resisting Adversarial Attacks using Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoderscited by 26
  37. 2019Wasserstein Smoothing: Certified Robustness against Wasserstein Adversarial Attackscited by 25
  38. 2021Mutual Adversarial Training: Learning together is better than going alonecited by 17

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

10 papers.